![]() |
Enron Mail |
Steve - attached is a new chart that paints a clearer picture of the existing
generation emissions v. new generation emissions. Some of the units are fairly inefficient ('though some of these units are currently in the process of "repowering" to increase their efficiency) which increases their effective emissions. (see Chart 1) In thinking more about the discrepancies in emissions b/w existing and new generation, it really amounts to a fundamental flaw in the rules for nonattainment areas in the Clean Air Act. These rules have no provisions for growth and create a pretty strong competitive advantage for existing sources of emissions. Basically, any new sources in nonattainment areas have to go to existing sources and convince them to reduce their emissions. In CA's case - since they have been nonattainment for so many years many of the sources of emission reductions have already been tapped. In other nonattainment areas like Houston and Atlanta - the nonattainment geographic boundaries are so small that there are only a handful of significant stationary sources of emissions. I don't think CA is going to be able to effect a lot of change on their own. It is going to take a Federal legislative fix. Let me know what other information you need. Mary Schoen Environmental Strategies Enron Corp 713-345-7422
|