|
|
Enron Mail |
The letter looks fine. Eric H's letter was addressed to "market
participants." Can we get EPSA or WPTF to file this letter? Alan C. Mary Hain 01/25/2001 04:58 PM To: Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, steve.c.hall@enron.com, Richard Sanders, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hartsoe@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James E Keller/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, gfergus@brobeck.com, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Greg Wolfe@ECT, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro cc: Subject: Confidential Attorney Client Privilege - Attorney Work Product I have drafted the attached letter denying the Cal ISO's request to send it (and the EOB) EPMI and EES' cost information for transactions over the FERC's cost cap. Since I believe we are on very firm ground, my initial inclination was to send no response to the ISO's letter, so there would be nothing to quote in the press. However, I drafted this letter at Alan's suggestion for purposes of discussion. We should decide whether to send a letter before distributing this draft more widely in-house to discuss how to parse the message.
|