|
|
Enron Mail |
Isn't our primary problem with AEP's internal merchant function rather than
with the marketing affiliate (I realize we have problems with the affiliate too)? Can we protest continued market based rate authority for AEP until they have surrendered native load priority? Christi L Nicolay@ECT 09/25/2000 09:16 AM To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: EPMI protests AEP's continuation of MBRs On 9/21, EPMI filed a protest (Below) against AEP/CSW's 3 year update request to continue market based rates for power marketing. The filing includes examples of discriminatory behavior on OASIS (for ATCs, etc.) that potentially benefitted AEP's marketing side. EPMI has already protested Entergy's request for continuation of MBRs earlier this year, and plans to protest other large utility-based power marketer MBR filings this fall. Let me know if you would like the list. Thanks. ---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000 08:58 AM --------------------------- "Susan Buchheit" <sbuchheit@bracepatt.com< on 09/25/2000 09:05:19 AM To: <christi.l.nicolay@enron.com< cc: Subject: AEP filing ** High Priority ** Christi - Attached is the final filing in word. I also sent you a hard copy on Friday. - aep.doc
|