|
|
Enron Mail |
I realize you have pushed these guys already, but the attached letter would
be better if not sent at all. It doesn't address the real underlying problem -- that a "reliability bill" on a stand alone basis doesn't fix the problem. Instead, the letter implies that the reason for opposition is merely a political consideration -- ie that it may reduce Congress' appetite for action next year. If possible, it would be better not to have the letter go out at all. From: Cynthia Sandherr 08/22/2000 04:29 PM To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, dwatkiss@bracepatt.com cc: Subject: MidAmerican Draft Documents Per my first e-mail, here's MidAmerican's position letter on the stand alone Reliability measure. Seems the best we can do with the utilities who have been supporting our position is to have them take a "no position" stance on the stand alone bill. - reliabilityonly.letter.doc
|