|
|
Enron Mail |
Can we be even stronger on this? The short answer is that Joe's resignatio=
n=20 has no impact on our view toward India. The evaluation of our asset holdin= gs=20 and new business opportunities is the same the day after Joe's resignation = as=20 it was the day before. If need be, we can reiterate previous statements=20 about our ongoing review of asset positions. What do you think? =09John Ambler@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT =0910/24/2000 06:46 PM =09=09=20 =09=09 To: Cliff Baxter@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Koenig@ENRO= N, J=20 Mark Metts@Enron, Paula Rieker@ENRON =09=09 cc: Mark Palmer@ENRON, Karen Denne@ENRON, Cindy Derecskey@ECT =09=09 Subject: Sutton India Statement We expect considerable Indian media interest and attempts to interpret the= =20 implications of Joe Sutton's resignation. In consultation with Mark Palmer= =20 and others, we have developed the following statement, which we intend to u= se=20 only in response to media inquiries. Please let me know if you have any=20 comments. John For Enron Use =01) Only if Asked October 24, 2000 Statement on Impact of Sutton Resignation on Enron in India Joe Sutton=01,s departure should not significantly affect Enron=01,s commit= ment to=20 the Indian market. In fact, consistent with Enron=01,s new business lines,= we=20 are in the process of developing data centers and a fiber optic network in= =20 India. Of course, we continuously look to optimize the value of our busine= ss=20 interests and there may be some related adjustments in our holdings, but we= =20 expect to continue as a significant participant in the Indian market. If pressed: We are not able to comment on specific plans or operations, as it is our=20 policy not to comment on the details of potential divestitures or=20 acquisitions.
|