Enron Mail

From:steven.kean@enron.com
To:barbara.hueter@enron.com
Subject:Re: Azurix, Grand Rapids contract
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Sun, 5 Nov 2000 10:51:00 -0800 (PST)

Thanks, Barb.



Barbara A Hueter
11/03/2000 02:15 PM

To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: John Stokes/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Azurix, Grand Rapids contract

John Stokes. Laird Smith and I spoke with Eric Schneidewind this afternoon.
Varnum is currently representing the city on isolated matters. Varnum is
approaching the city attorney to obtain a waiver of any conflict of interest
so that they may engage in lobbying activities on Azurix's behalf. Eric is
very confident that the city attorney will issue with waiver. Varnum made it
clear that should Azurix lose the contract and wish to engage in any legal
action against the city, then Azurix would not be able to use Varnum b/c of
their existing relationship with the city. John assured Eric that it is
extremely unlikely that Azuriz would ever pursue legal action against the
city.

John Stokes has asked that Varnum deal directly with Tom Maxwell in the
Edmonton office once the waiver is obtained.

They will keep us posted on progress.


---------------------- Forwarded by Barbara A Hueter/NA/Enron on 11/03/2000
02:08 PM ---------------------------


Barbara A Hueter
11/03/2000 09:26 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: John Stokes/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Azurix, Grand Rapids contract

I have spoken with Eric Schneidewind our attorney at Varnum, Riddering,
Schmidt and Howlett in Lansing. He is contacting other attorneys in the firm
to follow up on this immediately. Varnum is one of the two major west
Michigan law firms and is based in Grand Rapids.

John Stokes and I have spoken. As soon as I learn anything from our
attorneys, I will be in contact with him.

I also have a call into our lobbying firm, Karoub Associates. I doubt that
they could be more effective than Varnum on this one, but I want them in the
loop b/c they might have some pull with key officials in Grand Rapids.

I will keep you posted.


From: Steven J Kean on 11/02/2000 08:52 AM
To: John Stokes/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX
cc: Janine Migden/DUB/EES@EES, Barbara A Hueter/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Help in Michigan

John -- I'm copying Janine and Barb on this message as they are most likely
to be able to identify someone.

Janine and Barb -- could one of you get in touch with John?



John Stokes@AZURIX
11/02/2000 06:45 AM

To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Amanda K Martin/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX
Subject: Help in Michigan

Once again, I come to you for help. We were awarded a biosolids dewatering
contract in Grand Rapids, Michigan about a month ago. We had bid against the
incumbent, a company called Synagro. You may recall that Azurix is in
litigation with Syangro over a busted acquisition, but the two events are not
related. In any case, we were low bidder, and the recommendation was made to
award the contract to us. Synagro has been working to get the award
overturned, and appears to have been successful. It is not yet clear whether
they are going to award the deal to Synagro, or re-bid. It is not even clear
what the grounds are for overturning the award, which indicates that it may
be pure politics.

Do we have any good political consultants that could help us in Grand
Rapids? We do not have much of a presence in that area, and were responding
to a publicly advertised bid. Price and technical qualifications were the
only issues. Politics did not enter into it until now, so we were caught a
little flat-footed.

Any suggestions?