Enron Mail

From:mary.hain@enron.com
To:phillip.allen@enron.com, robert.badeer@enron.com, tim.belden@enron.com,shelia.benke@enron.com, donald.black@enron.com, william.bradford@enron.com, rick.buy@enron.com, andre.cangucu@enron.com, alan.comnes@enron.com, wanda.curry@enron.com, jeff.dasovi
Subject:About Duke's Complaint
Cc:debra.davidson@enron.com, paula.warren@enron.com, mercy.gil@enron.com,karen.heathman@enron.com, lysa.akin@enron.com, leticia.botello@enron.com, joseph.alamo@enron.com, janette.elbertson@enron.com, bernadette.hawkins@enron.com, sharon.purswell@enron.
Bcc:debra.davidson@enron.com, paula.warren@enron.com, mercy.gil@enron.com,karen.heathman@enron.com, lysa.akin@enron.com, leticia.botello@enron.com, joseph.alamo@enron.com, janette.elbertson@enron.com, bernadette.hawkins@enron.com, sharon.purswell@enron.
Date:Thu, 15 Feb 2001 05:39:00 -0800 (PST)

Here's the answer to your question about paragraphs 42 and 44 of Duke's
complaint. Although CDWR is technically the SC for the UDCs in the short
term bilateral market and the ISO, as a practical matter, if CDWR does not
like the prices offered in the bilateral market, it waits to buy the power
from the ISO. Then CDWR reviews the price of the ISO's purchases and
(according to an article in Megawatt daily) it "does not authorize the
payment at prices it deems unreasonable."