Call to Bob Glynn

Per our discussion this morning, below is a summary of items to discuss with
Glynn:

Adding Enron's "negative CTC claim" to the list of claims: PGE's filing
included a list of top twenty creditors. Our negative CTC claim was
apparently not taken into account in compiling that list. The list is
nonbinding, however. PG&E will be required to file schedules of creditors on
April 20. Our negative CTC claim should be on Schedule F (for unsecured
claims). You may want to remind Glynn of your previous conversations and
state our expectation that the negative CTC claim will appear (preferably as
uncontested) in the April 20 filing. (Note: if PG&E does not include the
claim we have an opportunity to file a proof of claim and ultimately the
court determines the validity of the claim).
Including Enron on the Creditors' Committee: PG&E may have the opportunity
to influence representation on the creditors' committees. There are several
reasons to suggest to Glynn that we be included: 1) we are a big creditor, 2)
we could be helpful in crafting a broader solution, and 3) we are one of the
real parties in interest behind the PX and ISO (who were listed as
significant creditors but are really just "passthroughs" for the suppliers
... and PG&E likely would not want to have those political bodies serving on
the creditors committee anyway).