Enron Mail

From:harry.kingerski@enron.com
To:sandra.mccubbin@enron.com, sgovenar@govadv.com, hgovenar@govadv.com,mday@gmssr.com
Subject:Changes to DA bill
Cc:susan.mara@enron.com, janel.guerrero@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com,james.steffes@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, steven.kean@enron.com, robert.neustaedter@enron.com, mike.smith@enron.com, vicki.sharp@enron.com, leslie.lawner@enron.com, pa
Bcc:susan.mara@enron.com, janel.guerrero@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com,james.steffes@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, steven.kean@enron.com, robert.neustaedter@enron.com, mike.smith@enron.com, vicki.sharp@enron.com, leslie.lawner@enron.com, pa
Date:Fri, 30 Mar 2001 01:18:00 -0800 (PST)

Highlights of AB21X that passed the AB and new Bowen version:

AB 21X contained: Changes in new Bowen SB 27

before effective date, customer can go DA without limitation but only if
customer was not purchasing from utility after Jan 17. Exit fee may apply if
customer was purchasing from utility after Jan 17
existing DA can stay DA
after effective date, customer can go DA upon payment of exit fee based on
DWR's unavoidable costs
after effective date, customer can go DA w/o exit fee if using self-gen or
cogen and with 180 days advance notice DELETE
re-entry fee applies for return to bundled service from DA, unless 12 months
advance notice is given opportunity to avoid with 12 months advance notice is
deleted
portion of the customer's load served by utility is not limited from going DA
under this bill DELETE
load growth may be used to allow residential and small commercial to go DA
w/o exit fee DELETE
Commission notifies customers of their choices within 30 days of effective
date 90 days

The first point is the most critical. It exposes customers to exit fees if
they go DA before the effective date. If we can argue to the DWR that no
costs were really incurred by them - in fact, their burden was relieved by
load going DA - this problem goes away. Better to clarify in the legislation
if we can. Other than that, a couple of the Christmas tree ornaments have
been taken off. (These were nice, but, let's be realistic).

Seems to me this is still a pretty good bill! (especially if we can clarify
that CPUC's new 3 cent surcharge doesn't apply to DA. ) With either bill, we
still have the issue of how to measure net avoidable DWR costs for exit fee
purposes.