|
|
Enron Mail |
As folks know, I am sending our suggested legislative language to DOE this
afternoon, The package you were asked to review contained legislative language making RTO participation mandatory. After further discussions with Tom Briggs, I am not sending the mandatory RTO language as a part of our package. My concern with sending it as legislative language is that this would muddy the waters on our open access rulemaking (a draft of which we are getting this Friday from Watkiss and which we plan to transmit to DOE next week). FERC has existing authority to make RTO participation mandatory. Thus, instead of fighting out the issue in the legislative sphere, we should reserve it for a possible rulemaking in open access. We decided not to two track open access, so I don't think we want to two track mandatory RTOs. If anyone disagrees with this strategy, we can send it first thing Thursday in legislative form to DOE. ----- Forwarded by Linda Robertson/NA/Enron on 06/13/2001 02:25 PM ----- Rick Hogan 06/13/2001 01:38 PM To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON Subject: DOE legislative language Mr. Kean, Please review the final versions of the attached documents and make any comments directly to Linda, ASAP. Please note that we are revising the interconnect language. Donna Bobbish at V&E will soon submit the changes.
|