Enron Mail

From:mitchell.taylor@enron.com
To:skean@enron.com
Subject:FW: PUCN Filing - Monday, January 29, 2001
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:02:00 -0800 (PST)

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Mitchell Taylor/Corp/Enron on 01/29/2001
06:58 PM ---------------------------


"Erickson, Vicki" <VErickson@sppc.com< on 01/29/2001 05:06:32 PM
To: "'mitchell.taylor@enron.com'" <mitchell.taylor@enron.com<
cc:

Subject: FW: PUCN Filing - Monday, January 29, 2001




< -----Original Message-----
< From: Erickson, Vicki
< Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 3:04 PM
< To: 'mitchell.taylor@enron.colm'; 'Mark.metts@enron.com';
< 'Paul.Kaufman@enron.com'
< Cc: Oldham, Steve; Atkinson, Rich
< Subject: PUCN Filing - Monday, January 29, 2001
<
< Earlier today, Sierra Pacific and Nevada Power filed a plan with the
< Public Utilities Commission of Nevada (PUCN) that is designed to stabilize
< the energy markets in the state. Below is the text of a news release
< announcing the emergency Comprehensive Energy Plan. Also attached is the
< filing with exhibits.
<
< Let me know if you need anything else.
<
< Thanks, Vicki Erickson
<
< <<010129_application.pdf.pdf<< <<010129_plan.pdf.pdf<<
< <<010129_appendix_a.pdf.pdf<< <<010129_appendix_b.pdf.pdf<<
< <<010129_appendix_c.pdf.pdf<< <<010129_appendix_d.pdf.pdf<<
< <<010129_appendix_e.pdf.pdf<<
<
< Sierra Pacific, Nevada Power Offer Emergency Plan to Assure
< Reliable, Reasonably Priced Electricity for Nevadans
<
< Warning that Nevada must take rapid and dramatic action to avoid
< being "engulfed by the financial and operational chaos" of the California
< energy market, Sierra Pacific and Nevada Power CEO Walt Higgins today
< outlined an emergency package of proposed long-term contracts, tiered
< price increases, low income assistance and conservation programs to
< stabilize the energy markets in the state.
< In the plan filed today with the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada
< (PUCN), the companies are proposing short-term emergency price increases
< ranging from zero for certain low-usage customers to as much as 29 percent
< for the state's largest energy users to correct serious imbalances between
< the cost of wholesale power and retail prices. The average increase is 17
< percent.
< The same imbalance bringing the near collapse of the California power
< system is sweeping the Western U.S. and prompting nearly every other
< utility to take similar measures to assure reliable utility service.
< "Nevada, despite a good energy policy, is not immune from what is
< happening in California," said Higgins at a news conference today in Las
< Vegas. "This situation is unprecedented, unanticipated and potentially
< disastrous for Nevadans if we do not exercise the leadership it takes now
< to correct these imbalances in supply and demand and between cost and
< price. No business can continue selling a product for less than it costs
< them to buy it on the wholesale market.
< "We know any rate increase is painful, but there is no escaping the fact
< that the consequences of inaction are much more severe to the residents
< and businesses of this state, as California clearly shows. Nevadans simply
< cannot let the lights go out with the kind of irresponsible inaction we've
< witnessed over the hill. Even with this increase, our rates will still be
< lower than in California.
< "Moreover, as part of the plan we propose programs to help low-income
< customers and to help residents and businesses manage their total energy
< bills."
< In the plan filed today, the companies map out an emergency,
< comprehensive plan to meet the state's short- and long-term energy needs,
< focusing on new mechanisms to recover the skyrocketing cost of wholesale
< power and including automatic price reductions as wholesale prices
< eventually fall. The plan also calls for accelerated approval of new
< long-term power contracts and encourages new power plant development.
< Higgins said the plan also voices agreement with Nevada's go-slow approach
< to electricity deregulation.
< "The Nevada legislature and commission have shown a lot of foresight in
< how to
< handle energy deregulation in the state, and there is no reason to go
< backward," said
< Higgins. "What we need is to continue forward but in a way that clearly
< anticipates the impact of market forces in the state."
< Higgins noted that the pending sale of generation assets required as part
< of the merger of Sierra Pacific Resources and Nevada Power will allow the
< companies to buy power from the new plant owners at discounted prices for
< two years. However, he said the California turmoil has slowed the sales
< and put at risk these protective contracts.
< Sierra Pacific and Nevada Power are proposing that the new mechanism
< take effect on March 1, 2001. They propose that it be adjusted on March
< 1, 2002, or sooner as wholesale prices fall and if divestiture of the
< utilities' Nevada power plants is completed and contracts are in place
< that guarantee the company can purchase power from those plants for two
< years at 1998 prices.
< Nevada Power customers who use 400 kilowatt hours (kWh) of electricity or
< less per month and Sierra Pacific customers who use 300 kWh of electricity
< or less per month would not see this increase in their power bills due to
< the tiered rate. The proposal represents an overall increase in rates of
< approximately 17 percent.
< Higgins said that even with the July 2000 Global Settlement, which
< requires Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific to file monthly rate adjustments
< for fuel and purchased power (the F&PP Rider), the utilities have lost
< over $125 million on fuel and purchased
< power transactions.
< "We are losing millions and millions of dollars now and it will get much
< worse if this plan is not adopted," Higgins said. "We stand to lose
< hundreds of millions more because the caps on price increases are keeping
< rates artificially low. When the settlement was negotiated, no one
< expected prices for fuel and purchased power would continue to skyrocket
< to unheard of levels," Higgins said. "We've saved over $30 million in
< operating efficiencies since the Sierra Pacific - Nevada Power merger, but
< we simply do not have the same ability to control $1.5 billion annually of
< fuel and purchased power expenses in an energy marketplace that's gone
< haywire."
< In today's filing, the utilities state they will continue to make
< the monthly fuel and purchased power (F&PP) filings, which are scheduled
< to expire on March 1, 2003. Both the F&PP Rider and the new emergency
< Comprehensive Energy Plan (CEP) Rider proposed in the plan represent
< dollar-for-dollar pass through of wholesale costs.
< If approved, the CEP Rider will result in a monthly power bill increase of
< approximately $6.37 for a typical Sierra Pacific residential customer
< using 650 kilowatt hours (kWh) of electricity per month, and approximately
< $12.63 for a typical Nevada Power residential customer using 1,100 kWh of
< electricity.
< Up to $5 million in revenue generated by the CEP Rider would be provided
< to the State of Nevada to be used at the state's discretion to fund
< conservation and low-income protection programs.
< The proposed tiered rate offers protection for residents with low
< electricity usage and
< encourages consumers to be energy efficient. Residential CEP Rider rates
< are based on electricity usage as follows:
<
< Nevada Power
< ? First 400 kWh per month No charge
< ? Next 275 kWh per month $0.01500 per kWh
< ? Above 675 kWh per month $0.02000 per kWh
<
< Sierra Pacific Power
< ? First 300 kWh per month No charge
< ? Next 250 kWh per month $0.01500 per kWh
< ? Above 550 kWh per month $0.02617 per kWh
<
- 010129_application.pdf.pdf
- 010129_plan.pdf.pdf
- 010129_appendix_a.pdf.pdf
- 010129_appendix_b.pdf.pdf
- 010129_appendix_c.pdf.pdf
- 010129_appendix_d.pdf.pdf
- 010129_appendix_e.pdf.pdf