Enron Mail

From:cynthia.sandherr@enron.com
To:mark.palmer@enron.com
Subject:Legal Response to Southern Company
Cc:joe.hillings@enron.com, steven.kean@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com,joe.hartsoe@enron.com, sarah.novosel@enron.com, chris.long@enron.com, stephen.burns@enron.com, hubbardh@fleishman.com, martinki@fleishman.com
Bcc:joe.hillings@enron.com, steven.kean@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com,joe.hartsoe@enron.com, sarah.novosel@enron.com, chris.long@enron.com, stephen.burns@enron.com, hubbardh@fleishman.com, martinki@fleishman.com
Date:Fri, 2 Jun 2000 07:02:00 -0700 (PDT)

Mark: Earlier this week I e-mailed you Southern Company's two attack papers
on the MidAmerican/Stakeholders compromise legislative amendment on
non-discriminatory transmission access. As promised, attached herewith is
the responses from our two outside law firms as to why Southern's contentions
are inaccurate.

Both the full House Commerce Committee and full Senate Energy Committee will
be in mark-up on electricity legislation on June 14th. If you have not seen
it, June 3rd's National Journal has an excellent overview article entitled
"Electric Power Play....as Demands on the National Power Grid Raise the
Possibility of Outages, Congress Struggles to Restructure the Electricity
Industry." We gave Margie Kriz background for her story.