Enron Mail

From:ken@kdscommunications.com
To:sgovenar@govadv.com, mark.palmer@enron.com, ban.sharma@enron.com,david.leboe@enron.com, mary.schoen@enron.com, eletke@enron.com, jennifer.thome@enron.com, miyung.buster@enron.com, janel.guerrero@enron.com, ken@kdscommunications.com, rfrank@enron.com
Subject:Phil Angelides press conference announcing interim financing
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:43:00 -0700 (PDT)

California State Treasurer Phil Angelides held a press conference this
afternoon to announce that $3.5 billion in interim financing has been
arranged through J.P. Morgan and Lehman Brothers, and that an additional $1
billion in financing is expected to be completed next week from an
undisclosed source.
?
The financing is in conjunction with an executive order issued yesterday by
the governor that allows bond?sales for energy purchased by the Department
of Water Resources.? Previously, Gov. Davis and Treasurer Angelides had
sought legislative approval of the bond issuance, but were not successful.?
Further review by state attorneys determined that the governor could
authorize the issuance of bonds by executive order with the difference that
the bonds can only be used for energy purchases going forward and cannot be
used?to backfill past general fund expenditures.?
?
A one-page?handout summarizing the financing has been sent to Houston.??The
vital statistics are:

The authorized loan amount is $5 billion, with an initial $3.5 billion
committed;
The rate is 4.75%, but will jump to 7% if the bonds are not issued
successfully by October 31, which is the scheduled maturity date of the loan
(Angelides emphasized that this is not the due date).

The goal of the financing is to stem the flow of funds from the general fund
for power purchases and avert a cash crisis.? The financing, which also
provides working capital for continued?state energy purchases,?is secured by
revenues from electricity sales and will be repaid by the bonds.
?
Angelides noted that the financing, which he hopes to have totally closed by
July 1, precludes generators from walking away from contracts under the
clause that requires financing by a certain date.? He said it satifsies
"most" DWR contracts and?precludes arguments made by generators for a
"credit premium."
?
Angelides also said that the financing is important because it "builds
momentum" for the huge revenue bond sale and that it "sends a powerful
signal to Wall Street that the bond issue is real."
?
According to his figures, the general fund is currently out about $5.2
billion net ($6.1 billion in purchases minus $900 million in revenues) in
power purchases through June 12.
?
Steps still must occur before the bonds can be issued, he said.? The PUC has
to adopt rate agreements, adopt a servicing order with the utilities to
collect revenues to repay the bonds, and has to enact rate increases of
about 3 cents/kwh in SDG&E's territory.? Angelides noted that the lenders
have made their financial commitment event though these PUC actions are
still outstanding.
?
The bonds will not be issued until early September.? Angelides said late
August is a terrible time because the financial community is on a pre-Labor
Day holiday and that the state would hold off until the more favorable
period following the holiday.
?



?
Earlier in the afternoon, the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights --
Harvey Rosenfield's group -- held a press conference to voice opposition to
the Edison MOU.? They all seem to agree that the MOU is likely dead, but are
afraid of it arising at a later date in some form.
?
When asked about the business community being asked to shoulder the costs of
utilities' debt, Rosenfield said that a problem has arisen in that business
wants direct access but DWR has already purchased the power they "don't
want."? He believes Edison alone should be responsible for its debt; it's
government's role to go forward, he said, and Edison's job to "clean up its
mess."
?
Rosenfield cautioned that if legislators "make the mistake of paying one
more penny" towards a bailout there will be a referendum on the bailout and
the legislators voting for it.? He said they would be held personally
accountable.
?
(Exactly what he means by this is unclear.? In California, a "referendum" --
which is the word he used -- is a little-used tool to overturn legislation
that has been passed and signed.? Whether he was threatening recall attempts
is also unclear.)
?
Rosenfield added that depending on how things progress, there could be an
initiative and it could include a public power component.
?
The press release issued at the press conference, which also featured Harry
Snyder of Consumers Union, has been forwarded to Houston.? It is also
available through this link:
http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/utilities/pr/pr001706.php3
?
?