QF Meeting Today--Highlights

----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 02/28/2001 02:02 PM -----

James D Steffes
02/28/2001 07:54 AM

To: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, bhansen@lhom.com, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, hgovenar@govadv.com, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, JBennett@GMSSR.com, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron,
jkradin@marathon-com.com, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, mday@gmssr.com, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT,
rcarroll@bracepatt.com, rlichtenstein@marathon-com.com, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron,
syamane@marathon-com.com, SGovenar@govadv.com, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron,
Susan J Mara/NA/Enron
cc:
Subject: QF Meeting Today--Highlights

While we don't need to do any lobbying on this bill, if anyone hears any
information about chances for success it would be good to get the info to
me. Enron Wind has an interest in seeing this bill move forward.

Thanks,

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 02/28/2001 07:52 AM -----

Alan Comnes@ECT
02/27/2001 10:32 PM

To: David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Michael Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F
Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mark Fillinger/SF/ECT@ECT, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Hap Boyd/EWC/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: QF Meeting Today--Highlights

Despite the fact the bill, by itself, does not guarantee payment for overdue
receivables, the QFs on today's call decided to go forward and push for SBX
47 irrespective of the progress on SBX 33. A press conference is planned for
Friday by IEP. Bowen, who heads up the first committee that this bill will
go through will have hearings on this bill on Tuesday at the earliest.

Jan S-J asked every QF to fax to IEP a description of all QF generation and
the zip code of each project so that they can begin lobbying specific
legislators. A significant PR push is planned.

SBX 47 is opposed by SCE. PG&E's position appears more ambivalent. One
angle would be to try to get PG&E to support Enron's swap/SC language and
make inclusion of such language a condition of PG&E's support.

GAC