|
|
Enron Mail |
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 02/20/2001 01:28 PM -----
Sherri Sera 02/15/2001 11:48 AM To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Joannie Williamson/Corp/Enron@ENRON Subject: Re: Legal/Political Time-bomb Ticking Steve, I thought you should probably see this, too. Any idea what this guy is rambling about? SRS From: Joannie Williamson 02/15/2001 11:10 AM To: Rex Rogers/Corp/Enron, Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Legal/Political Time-bomb Ticking I'm still trying to sift thru this, but I thought you should read. Joannie ---------------------- Forwarded by Joannie Williamson/Corp/Enron on 02/15/2001 11:07 AM --------------------------- Will Griffin <griffgrp@bellsouth.net< on 02/15/2001 10:52:22 AM To: joannie.williamson@enron.com cc: investor-relations@enron.com, corpcomm@hughes.com, diana.ball@hsc.com, parkem@hhmi.org, brickhil@hhmi.org, stumpfs@hhmi.org, mullinsr@hhmi.org, james.doty@bakerbotts.com, bruce.kiely@bakerbotts.com, walter.smith@bakerbotts.com, tolson@gibsondunn.com, whowell@gibsondunn.com Subject: Legal/Political Time-bomb Ticking Dear Ms. Williamson: Per an autoresponder from Yorleni Mendez, I am forwarding to you what I sent to Enron & others a couple of days ago, which was in supplement to what I sent on Feb. 6th. Time is of the essence and not on your side. Nor are the facts & the law on your side. Therefore, you need to find a way to get us to be on your side. Due to the urgency and foreseeable and announced forthcoming event horizons, I believe you may wish to provide copies of the attached to the proper persons at Enron for their immediate attention. Please let them know that if I have to continue to give information & documents to the U.S. Senate and the proper others, that I will do so and then also show that the failure of Hughes interests/companies to take remedial measures was indeed blatant refusal. We have already logged where Hughes companies/interests have been to http://willgriffin.com/hughes.htm thus you might as well continue to visit there and see where we have posted changes and new information. The knowledge of the Hughes companies/interests of these matters is now clearly established. We've already submitted some of our visitor logs and other documents to the proper others, establishing the knowledge of Hughes companies/interests to others. This is something I am sure will be most meaningful to the lawyers, along with a few other things I'm sure which will get their attention.. Also please have someone forward the attached to William Rice Lummis, James A. Baker and others and advise them that surprises, attention getters & wake-up calls are just around the corner. They need to contact us soon, before it becomes improper to discuss how a reasonable (fanny & facing-saving) resolve for Hughes interests/companies may be achieved. Will Griffin http://willgriffin.com/hughes.htm X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Message-ID: <3A8970D3.C2FBB441@bellsouth.net< Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 11:37:24 -0600 From: Will Griffin <griffgrp@bellsouth.net< Organization: Griffin Group X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-bls40 (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: corpcomm@hughes.com, diana.ball@hsc.com, investor-relations@enron.com, parkem@hhmi.org, brickhil@hhmi.org, stumpfs@hhmi.org, mullinsr@hhmi.org, james.doty@bakerbotts.com, bruce.kiely@bakerbotts.com, walter.smith@bakerbotts.com, tolson@gibsondunn.com, whowell@gibsondunn.com Subject: Advisory of Your Legal/Political Exposures Coming True Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------C4135F3BD40002931C95C2CA" Dear Hughes Electronics, Enron, HHMI, and Hughes Lawyers, et. al: I am fully aware how many of the Hughes interests visited http://willgriffin.com/hughes.htm after I sent you an e-mail on Feb. 6, 2001, advising you of your impending difficulties and exposures. I have made some changes to these Hughes related pages, including posting my advisory to you to http://willgriffin.com/letterto.htm for your convenience and reference, with active e-mail links to you and each other. Also since I contacted you last week (the next day), Enron has been in the news as being the biggest beneficiary of the California energy woes, while also being the largest contributor, fund-raiser and general benefactor to President George W. Bush. http://www0.mercurycenter.com:80/premium/business/docs/enron07.htm Another article goes even further showing the relationship of James Addison Baker III to Enron and Hughes "Bush's Biggest Donors Gain From High Prices in California Crunch" http://www.villagevoice.com:80/issues/0106/ridgeway3.shtml You may wish to re-visit the updated http://willgriffin.com/hughes.htm (refesh/reload the page to clear your browser's cache of the previous copy) after reviewing the news articles links about Enron provided above. You should know and reasonably foresee that you are not the only visitors to my Hughes pages. You should also know that I've had contact with the proper authorities and this to include correspondences within this past week. Then again, I'm sure many in the pipeline of those who review this and my previous advisory know this to be true, or to reasonably foresee the interest of many others at a minimum. I believe you to foresee more to soon become public difficulties for you and that the intensity will no doubt increase significantly. You should know that any political related problems will include Democrats in volumes, but there exists quite a few Republicans who will disavow and distance themselves from you. The China-Hughes missile & satellite technology transfers, that were cited in the Cox Committee report, and the arming of Sadaam Hussein with Hughes technologies issues are about to pop up their heads and see a longer shadow than the groundhog recently did. This, in addition to the recent articles about Enron, current activities and forthcoming event horizons, is not good news for Hughes interests. You just might want to ask William Rice Lummis and James A. Baker III, et. al. how they intend to solicit the help of the guy who holds the keys to resolve, who they've got a little miffed at them, because of what was done to him in an ad hominem attempt. Certainly, when it is true that if he now does nothing and a profound correlation exists between how bad things go for you and how good things go as a result for him, then why should he help y'all? It appears if you ask Mr. Baker about the Matter of Hughes and how we hold the keys to an amiable resolve, that he will stipulate that it will take some real "Politics of Diplomacy" to persuade us to help you, but that this needs to be urgently accomplished. Will Griffin - griffgrp.vcf - griffgrp.vcf
|