|
|
Enron Mail |
Mark has some editorial changes to the letter if there is still time
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/04/2000 03:41 PM ----- Mark.Schroeder@enron.com 10/04/2000 10:39 AM To: Steven.J.Kean@enron.com cc: Subject: Re: Two suggestions: I think the word "forgoing" should be "foregoing", and I do not see the need for us to say what the Chinese Government decided, as opposed to saying: "Subsequently, we understand the Chinese Government decided . . . " mcs From: Steven J Kean@ENRON on 04/10/2000 10:30 Sent by: Steven J Kean@ENRON To: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Kelly Kimberly/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Michael Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: FYI ----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/04/2000 10:29 AM ----- John Ambler@ENRON_D To: Rosalee Fleming@ENRON EVELOPMENT cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Palmer@ENRON, Kelly Kimberly@Enron 10/03/2000 Communications, Lauren Goldblatt@ECT 03:26 PM Subject: Rosie, On September 25, 2000 the Tibetan Government-in-exile wrote Dr. Lay at the Beijing office address requesting that Enron cancel its participation in the Sebei-Lanzhou pipeline. We faxed a copy of this communication to you a few minutes ago. We have drafted the attached proposed response. Rebecca McDonald concurs with the approach in this letter, which has been reviewed by the addressees of this message. Your assistance in appropriately formatting and printing the letter for signature would be appreciated. Please let me know if you have any questions or need assistance. Thanks, John (See attached file: Tibet Letter from Ken Lay 092800.doc) - Tibet Letter from Ken Lay 092800.doc
|