|
|
Enron Mail |
fyi
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 12/19/2000 10:50 AM ----- Rebecca McDonald@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT 12/18/2000 09:32 AM To: Peter E Weidler/NA/Enron@ENRON cc: Don Hawkins/OTS/Enron@Enron, James A Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, (bcc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron) Subject: Re: spreadsheet Pete, I would like to weigh in on this, if you don't mind. First of all, I requested meetings with the audit and EHS folks to understand our procedures and our status. So, no fair ranting at Don. Secondly, your note brings to mind what I find the most troublesome about our process as it currently stands. It is not now, nor will it be in the future the audit department's responsibility to ensure that corrective actions are taken as a result of the audit process. It is the responsibility of the business leader and the business management. So, follow up with the companies should have been a communication from you to the business unit head, not from Don to the business and Don to you. But, we are going to work all of this out and in the meantime, we aren't going to get crosswise with each other. This is going to be an "open kimono" kind of place and no information is going to be managed away from me. I will be staying on top of things and I will be involved with all of the support groups, with the business leaders and with the executive managment.. And, problems that are uncovered will be owned by all of us responsible for the business and the appropriate handling of those issues will be a matter of performance between the business and myself. So, please, calm down and let's all get off on the right foot. Enjoy your holiday, darn it! Rebecca Peter E Weidler@ENRON 12/17/2000 05:55 PM To: Don Hawkins/OTS/Enron@Enron cc: James A Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rebecca McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT Subject: Re: spreadsheet Don - really - this kind of upsets me - I thought you were going to call me if we were having any problems - this report looks like crap and is not reflective of actual status - I know TGS has completed most of its outstanding items - Does your team call and follow up with the individual companies - requesting a status report ? If so give me the names of who called and who you talked to and the date of the call. What is the concern about Cuiaba - they got a 90 + score - TGS and Centragas are in South America - not carribbean. Why did you not list the scores ? Really - I think this report and the handling of transmitting this information is completely different from my understanding of our understanding of how this is supposed to work. You were going to follow up with the companies and let me know if there were any problems and I was going to go fix the problems - Report says there are problems and the first I hear of it is when you go and report to my bosses. This does not begin to reflect the concepts we had discussed. Pete Don Hawkins 12/14/2000 11:10 AM To: Peter E Weidler/NA/Enron@Enron, David Shields/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT cc: Subject: spreadsheet Guys, for your information and a heads up. I am going to be visiting with Rebecca and Jim this afternoon on their support going forward on timely completion of action items as well as support that the audit program is mandatory not optional. We have always had both of you guys support so no problem there. David, you may want to talk to Stephen about IGL. and Pete you may want to look at Cuiaba. If I can help, please let me know. Don ---------------------- Forwarded by Don Hawkins/OTS/Enron on 12/14/2000 11:05 AM --------------------------- Janice Hollaway 12/14/2000 11:02 AM To: Don Hawkins/OTS/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: spreadsheet
|