|
|
Enron Mail |
SK - I printed this email (w/ attachment) and put it on the stack next to
your phone messages. mm Rick, Jim and Steve: Please find attached a revise doutline for the policy paper on RTO development. A few things to note (to make sure you are truly OK with it): - the "base model" described will basically be a "PJM Light" with energy-only bids. This will involve a centralized unit commitment process (based on a constrained optimization) and financial transmission rights. All other items on the "wish list" will be treated as future potential developments. - there will a substantial section on market power issues and RTO development. - there will a section on the relationship between wholesale and retail market development. The main idea is that a "wholesale only" market without price signals sent to customers is not going to be viable. - the main conclusion section will center on a "100 days" (not literally 100 days) set of policy proposals for getting workable markets established across the country ASAP. Comments welcome. Seabron This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at (617) 354-0060 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any e-mail and any printout thereof. Seabron Adamson Frontier Economics Inc Two Brattle Square Cambridge, MA 02138 USA Ph: (617) 354-0060 Fax: (617) 354-0640 seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com www.frontier-economics.com -----Original Message----- From: James.D.Steffes@enron.com [mailto:James.D.Steffes@enron.com] Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 10:22 PM To: Steven.J.Kean@enron.com; Seabron Adamson; Richard.Shapiro@enron.com Subject: new draft Seabron -- Here is a paper Brattle is putting together for Enron in Japan. ?See Section 5 - A Japanese Pool. ?They make several good arguments as to why a mandatory pool with financial settlements around the pool is key for Japanese liberalization. ? Maybe steal some of their ideas for our US policy arguments. Jim ----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 03/19/2001 01:04 PM ----- |------------------------+------------------------+------------------------| | | Mark Schroeder@ECT | | | | | ? ? ? ? To: | | | 03/19/2001 05:25 AM | James D | | | | Steffes/NA/Enron@Enro| | | | n | | | | ? ? ? ? cc: | | | | Mark | | | | Crowther/AP/Enron@Enr| | | | on, Steven J | | | | Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, | | | | Nicholas | | | | O'Day/AP/Enron@Enron | | | | ? ? ? ? Subject: | | | | new draft | |------------------------+------------------------+------------------------| Jim - this is what we discussed in Houston last week, i.e., a proposal for a market in Japan. ?Any thoughts would be appreciated, I am sure, by Mark Crowther and Nick O'Day. ? thanks ?mcs ---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 19/03/2001 11:28 --------------------------- To: ? ? ? ?"Mark Crowther" <Mark.Crowther@enron.com< cc: ? ? ? ?"Mark Schroeder" <Mark.Schroeder@enron.com<, "Peter Styles" <Peter.Styles@enron.com<, "Paul Dawson" <Paul.Dawson@enron.com<, <Nicholas.O'Day@enron.com< Subject: ? ? ? ?new draft Mark: please find attached the new draft. As we ?discussed this morning, we still need to add some details (cites etc) that you ?will send us, and also add additional local examples which you will ?identify. I would like to spend a few more hours going over ?the appendices, so will send them to you on Monday. Look forward to getting your ?thoughts, and hopefully to seeing you over here in April. Regards, Boaz - 01-03-30 SA Revised outline for policy paper.doc
|