Enron Mail

From:gavin.dillingham@enron.com
To:filuntz@aol.com, liz@luntz.com, nicholas.o'day@enron.com,mike.dahlke@enron.com
Subject:SDG&E Prices
Cc:steven.kean@enron.com
Bcc:steven.kean@enron.com
Date:Fri, 1 Sep 2000 06:42:00 -0700 (PDT)

---------------------- Forwarded by Gavin Dillingham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
09/01/2000 01:40 PM ---------------------------



Jeff Dasovich@EES
09/01/2000 01:30 PM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@ENRON
cc: Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L
Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Gavin
Dillingham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON, Harry
Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES

Subject: Re: California Lawmakers Vote to Limit Power Costs - WSJ

Here are some more prices. Many thanks to Roger Yang.




Steven J Kean@ENRON
09/01/2000 08:27 AM
Sent by: Steven J Kean@ENRON
To: Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Gavin Dillingham/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Harry
Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: California Lawmakers Vote to Limit Power Costs - WSJ

Look at this. Baum finally speaks up -- way too late.
Can somebody tell me what SDG&E's energy rate was pre-dereg?
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 09/01/2000
08:24 AM ---------------------------



From: Ann M Schmidt 09/01/2000 07:57 AM


To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Meredith Philipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: California Lawmakers Vote to Limit Power Costs - WSJ

F.Y.I.


California Lawmakers Vote to Limit Power Costs
By Rebecca Smith

09/01/2000
The Wall Street Journal
Page A4
(Copyright © 2000, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

California lawmakers voted to extend modest relief to San Diego residents
burdened with
high electricity bills and set the groundwork for faster construction of
badly needed power
plants. They stopped short, however, of passing legislation that would roll
back retail power
rates to levels seen prior to deregulation .

Late Wednesday, lawmakers sent a bill to Gov. Gray Davis that limits to 6.5
cents per
kilowatt hour the amount that small customers of San Diego Gas & Electric
Co. can be
charged. The utility is allowed to add power-delivery and other reasonable
costs to that
commodity price.

The price, equivalent to a bulk power cost of $65 per megawatt hour, is far
higher than the
average price of power for 27 of the 31 months in which California's market
has been
deregulated. But in June and July, the average price of power obtained by
the utility from a
state-sanctioned energy auction rose to 12 cents and 10.5 cents,
respectively, compared
with the 2.3 cents and 2.8 cents charged in those months a year earlier.

Passed directly through to customers,the resulting bills sparked a near
mutiny. The
rate-cap measure applies to residential and small commercial customers, as
well as to
schools and hospitals.

In addition to the rate cap, which can be adjusted upward or downward by
the California
Public Utilities Commission until December 2002, the legislature earmarked
$150 million of
general-fund revenue, which can be used to subsidize San Diego power costs
if they greatly
exceed the 6.5-cents-per-kilowatt-hour rate. For now, the utility would be
expected to make
up any difference between revenue collected and the actual cost.

Steve Baum, chairman of Sempra Energy, parent of San Diego Gas & Electric
Co., said the
rate-cap measure is "deeply flawed" because it limits the amount prices can
rise but sets
no floor. That means any shortfall could grow -- without a mechanism for
customers to pay
it down -- until the end of the rate-cap period, which could last until
December 2002 or
December 2003.

Mr. Baum said Sempra stands to suffer an undercollection of perhaps $664
million, provided
future prices approximate the New York Mercantile Exchange forward prices
through
December 2002. "It's irreparably damaging to Sempra," he said because it
"creates
tremendous uncertainty" that makes it hard for the San Diego energy company
to finance
new projects such as a new transmission line.

The legislature also appeared likely to approve a bill speeding up the
permit process for the
construction of new power plants, in part by beefing up staffs of
regulatory agencies that
review the plans.




Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.