Enron Mail

From:sandra.mccubbin@enron.com
To:james.steffes@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com,vicki.sharp@enron.com, msmith1@enron.com, jbennett@gmssr.com, bcragg@gmssr.com, mday@gmssr.com, sandra.mccubbin@enron.com, sgovenar@govadv.com, don.black@enron.com, harry.kingerski
Subject:Status report on Legislative Activity Thursday, Jan 25
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Thu, 25 Jan 2001 11:11:00 -0800 (PST)

Assembly Committee held a hearing on ABX1-18 Hertzberg, the speaker's
vehicle for allowing DWR to purchase power for the state and to use revenue
bonds to payoff utility undercollections and to finance ongoing DWR operating
costs. We have forwarded by fax the latest version of this bill. The
Assembly Committee was only able to discuss three sections of the bill before
adjourning until 1 pm tomorrow. Chairman Wright expects to take the
remainder of the afternoon tomorrow to go through the bill line by line and
expects to only get part way. He anticipates no hearings over the weekend
and more hearings to follow Monday through Wednesday next week. Thus no vote
on the bill is expected for a while. In addition, all parties, including
Wright expect amendments as a result of ongoing negotiations between the
Governor, Speaker, the utilities and the generators. These would center on
the price the generators will bid and how much if anything the utilities will
have to absorb of past undercollections. There is no indication at the
present of when they will show or what those amendments will say.

Initial analysis of the bill raises the following issues:

Most important issue On pages 3 - 8 of the bill, new provisions are added
to AB 1890 (Section 368 et al) to define how the TRA and TCBA are to be
calculated and what the Commission must allow in rates. These provisions
appear unduly generous to the utilities and may well provoke an immediate end
to the rate freeze if enacted. Here are the main elements of the language.

368.2 The Legislature finds that it is appropriate to allow the utility to
recover the reasonable costs incurred to purchase wholesale energy. (that
means the big under collection from summer 2000 to date)

368.3 New definitions of the "adjusted TCBA" and "net undercollected
amounts" are provided which appear to provide for the following way of
wrapping up transition cost ratemaking.

1. The TCBA is the positive balance as of 12-31-00 increased by the trust
transfer amounts to be recovered in rates for 2001, also increased by amounts
included in retail rates for prior period costs (if any are authorized by the
CPUC), and also increased by the balances in the generation memo accounts as
of 12-31-00.
2. The new "net uncollected amount" that the utilities could collect in
rates would be the current TRA account, as reduced by the above defined
balance in the TCBA as of 12-31-00.

NOTE: Edison claims this is the same mechanism that Enron proposed to the
Commission as an alternate to the TURN proposal. It has similarities to the
comments we filed Nov. 9, but our official position is still to support the
from-the-begining netting of the two accounts as proposed by TURN.

3. There is also language to lock in the CPUCs current ratemaking for these
accounts so that the TURN proposal to net the TRA and TCBA cannot be
implemented.

4. The utilities'retained generation will be put in rate base at book value,
except for the nukes, which will have their rate base calculated WITHOUT the
application of overcollections in the transition cost balancing account to
accelerate depreciation.

5. The CPUC is supposed to establish a dedicated rate component within the
existing rates as of 1-8-01 to allow recovery of the net undercollection (the
large TRA undercollection as reduced per the above). The undercollection is
to be amortized over 10 years.

6. The utilities will not have to buy power if their credit rating drops
below BBB+.

The remainder of the bill has to do with the mechanism for the DWR to
purchase power and to have revenue reduction bonds pay for costs in excess of
those recovered in the utilities rates. Rod Wright is seeking a "stop
loss"provision which will force a rate increase once the DWR has used up all
its appropriation and all the bond revenues to buy power. This is
controversial with the other members.

We have been asked for a reaction by the committee members and would like a
response ASAP, certainly by mid-day Friday. This will require balancing the
concerns about and early end to the rate freeze with the increased likelihood
of payment for power transactions once DWR is funded. The prospect of
successful participation in more auctions is unclear unless more practical
auction terms are used. However, the auction process is not spelled out in
this bill. The generators are supporting an early end to the freeze so that
they can be paid...I am in meetings starting early in the am so I will not
be on the 10:30 call, please send comments to scott govenor..either by e mail
or by fax, his fax is 9164480816. I am also interested in how we should
"message" this.