|
|
Enron Mail |
I'll call you as soon as I finish talking to Dick
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 10/06/99 09:05 AM --------------------------- From: Richard Ingersoll 10/06/99 12:13 AM To: James B Fallon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES cc: Subject: TVA/Enron Control Area Scheduling Agreement Note they backed off on not lettting us be a sink but again changed the language relating to the 20 min. They assure us verbally that they intend to honor the twenty minutes whenever possible. This could possibly be addressed in a cover letter so that if it is abused we can open up the agreement again. A copy of the cover letter would goto NERC and SERC. They also refuse to let us aggreate schedules. The IDC language was taken out but replaced with language eliminating any impact on commercial arrangement. Again, even though a cover letter may not be an official part of an agreement I believe, if we reach any agreement we should explain our expectations where they are not clearly defined in the agreement in a cover letter to SERC and NERC. ---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Ingersoll/HOU/ECT on 10/06/99 12:00 AM --------------------------- "Whitley, Stephen G." <sgwhitley@tva.gov< on 10/05/99 04:46:11 PM To: "Satterfield, Gail B." <gbsatterfield@tva.gov<, "'jmaughn@serc1.org'" <jmaughn@serc1.org<, Richard Ingersoll/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: "Boston, W. Terry" <wtboston@tva.gov<, "McCay, John A." <jamccay@tva.gov<, "Katine, Sanford D." <sdkatine@tva.gov<, "Whiting, G. Luke Jr." <glwhitin@tva.gov<, "Lundin, Bill W." <lwlundin@tva.gov<, "Lawson, Patricia S." <pslawson@tva.gov< Subject: TVA/Enron Control Area Scheduling Agreement Dick/Jim Here is an agreement that we can accept if SERC and Enron approves. It is my belief that it is consistent with the agreement reached in SERC/Atlanta last week. We have tried to accomodate Enron's concerns related to "non-binding" and "for IDC purposes only" in the lead-in paragraph. We do not think it is appropriate to address Gleason at this time -- we should get some operating experience with the present sites and see where the CATF is going. Gleason will not be operational until next year. Thanks <<03670328<< Gail -- please the FAX agreement and e-mail to Terry at his hotel - 03670328.doc
|