Enron Mail

From:marie.hejka@enron.com
To:steven.kean@enron.com
Subject:Executive preview of HP Portal
Cc:cindy.olson@enron.com, george.wasaff@enron.com, allan.sommer@enron.com
Bcc:cindy.olson@enron.com, george.wasaff@enron.com, allan.sommer@enron.com
Date:Thu, 1 Mar 2001 06:56:00 -0800 (PST)

Dear Steve,

This week George Wasaff, Allan Sommer, PriceWaterhouse, and I showed Rick=
=20
Buy, Rick Causey, and Philippe Bibi the HP portal demonstration. Each=20
reacted favorably. We are scheduled to show Cindy Olson next week. Sound=
=20
bytes below. =20

Philippe Bibi =01) 2/28/01
Philippe said, =01&I like this. Let=01,s get a proposal from PW.=018

=01&This portal initiative must be justified not on savings, but on=20
functionality. Savings is zero value. Soft savings are impossible to=20
measure. Bridge the firewall. Marie, Allan, and George put together a cos=
t=20
analysis.=018

Rick Causey =01) 2/27/01
Rick said the HP portal, =01&hits the nail on the head. Let me know how it=
goes=20
with Philippe, matter of fact I will try and attend tomorrow=01,s meeting w=
ith=20
Philippe.=018

Rick Causey would like to attend the HP off site visit with Steve. Further=
,=20
he suggested if Philippe concurs, he would like Steve, Philippe and him to=
=20
meet with Jeff Skilling to pitch the project. George Wasaff suggested he=
=20
include Mark Frevert in this meeting.=20

Rick Buy 2/27/01
Rick had a favorable response to the HP portal. He sees the HP portal as a=
=20
productivity exercise.
=20

More Sound Bytes from Executive Sponsor Follow Up Meetings


Philippe Bibi =01) 2/28/01
After PW reviewed a number of portal applications, Philippe said they were=
=20
good but not difficult. He requested to see transaction process and single=
=20
sign on applications. PW showed Philippe their Travel application. PW=20
emphasized this was the only way employees could schedule travel. =20
Previously, employees would call the 800 number and incur a ~$100.00 charge=
. =20
The online portal applications reduced the charge to $12.00.

PW emphasized Chrysler was spending $200.00 million per year in training. =
=20
The portal provided a skills inventory application which resulted in reduci=
ng=20
the training expenditures down to $100 million per year. Philippe could se=
e=20
how this would be of value in a blue-collar environment but could not see t=
he=20
value in our environment.=20

Philippe asked PW if they could demonstrate an application which was not=20
something shrink wrapped off the shelf. PW showed him their stock option=
=20
application and the training application. =20

PW emphasized HP had 83 autonomous Business Units which needed to be united=
=20
under this portal. Every day 90% of HP global employees access the portal.=
=20
Why? The portal is the only way to access a number of job related=20
applications. =20

Philippe asked about ad hoc reports. He said Enron has a problem getting a=
d=20
hoc reports. He said canned reports are not very useful. Further, he cann=
ot=20
get a quick ad hoc report of all the consultants currently billing and at=
=20
what expense. =20

Philippe said the ability to get in to SAP is a drawback. How did HP addre=
ss=20
applications that were not web enabled? Content management tools like iCli=
ck=20
and interwoven were used as delivery mechanisms for making enhanced=20
applications available via the web.

Philippe said this is a vehicle to pull together travel, ibuyit, Paine=20
Webber, Benefits, facilities, aviation, conference/video calls. What about=
=20
the guy who is doing trading, logistics, settlements, transactions with the=
=20
pipelines? Could this portal provide for that person? Philippe sees the=
=20
only benefit for this person would be the single sign on. =20

Philippe said, =01&Let me stress three things: 1) we have a series of=20
initiatives click@home, IM Task Force, Data Repository 2) Enron is not tha=
t=20
disciplined. We don=01,t want to get in the middle of policing publication=
of=20
information over the web (Per Clay, Interwoven allows other BU/Fus to=20
publish), 3) From an infrastructure perspective, the number of servers we=
=20
run as far as web servers, we run them clustered.=018

This portal initiative must be justified not on savings, but on=20
functionality. Savings is zero value. Soft savings are impossible to=20
measure. =01&Bridge the firewall.=018 Marie, Allan, and George put togeth=
er a=20
cost analysis. =20

Use PW as the catalyst.

Philippe said we would need processes around security. Philippe would like=
=20
to understand how HP did this. Philippe would like to see how to gap the=
=20
bridges. He is in favor of taking customer applications and making them=20
available from a single sign on. =20

Philippe recommended Allan Sommer, George Wasaff and Marie Hejka get togeth=
er=20
and come up with about 80% of the cost analysis information which otherwise=
=20
might have been developed during the two day workshop. Philippe recommends=
=20
stopping other projects and focusing on this project.=20

Rick Causey 3/01/01
Rick said the HP portal, =01&hits the nail on the head. Let me know how it=
goes=20
with Philippe, matter of fact I will try and attend the meeting.=018

Rick Causey would like to attend the HP off site visit with Steve. Further=
,=20
he suggested if Philippe concurs, he would like Steve, Philippe and him to=
=20
meet with Jeff Skilling to pitch the project. George Wasaff suggested he=
=20
include Mark Frevert in this meeting.=20

Rick see a few hurdles 1) getting buy in from all the companies 2) getting=
=20
buy in from Jeff Skilling 3) getting buy in from the technical side. =20

Also, noted is that Carly stopped 30 plus projects of web development to=20
focus on this effort. =20

The portal should include a forced information space to introduce new porta=
l=20
applications. =20

Rick Buy 3/01/01
Rick had a favorable response to the HP portal. He sees the HP portal as a=
=20
productivity exercise. How productive can this portal make Enron employees=
? =20
Rick sees the single sign on, single launch pad as valuable. PW reviewed t=
o=20
Rick the value in cost savings 1) headcount reduction 2) hardware reduction=
=20
3) duplicate site reduction.