Enron Mail

From:j..kean@enron.com
To:rob.bradley@enron.com
Subject:RE: Reply to Paul Krugman's column (Enron Goes Overboard, August
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Mon, 20 Aug 2001 08:17:43 -0700 (PDT)

Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Kean, Steven J. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=SKEAN<
X-To: Bradley, Rob </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rbradle<
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \SKEAN (Non-Privileged)\Kean, Steven J.\Sent Items
X-Origin: Kean-S
X-FileName: SKEAN (Non-Privileged).pst

Thanks, Rob. I was "writing angry" so I wasn't sure how it would come off.=
I did have my wife take a look and she assures me I didn't go "overboard"=
.

-----Original Message-----
From: =09Bradley, Rob =20
Sent:=09Monday, August 20, 2001 9:07 AM
To:=09Kean, Steven J.
Subject:=09RE: Reply to Paul Krugman's column (Enron Goes Overboard, August=
17)

Perfect blend of fire and reason in a sound bite world. I'm moving more to=
the right...

- Rob

-----Original Message-----
From: =09Kean, Steven J. =20
Sent:=09Saturday, August 18, 2001 8:49 AM
To:=09Bradley, Rob; Lay, Kenneth; 'stelzer@aol.com'; Palmer, Mark A. (PR)
Subject:=09FW: Reply to Paul Krugman's column (Enron Goes Overboard, August=
17)

I got fed up with Krugman . . . sent this out this am.

-----Original Message-----
From: =09Kean, Steven J. =20
Sent:=09Saturday, August 18, 2001 8:45 AM
To:=09'tang@nytimes.com'; 'letters@nytimes.com'
Subject:=09Reply to Paul Krugman's column (Enron Goes Overboard, August 17)

=09Paul Krugman has made frequent negative references to Enron and its mana=
gement in his New York Times column over the last twelve months. I have re=
frained from responding until now. Below (and in the attached in Word form=
at) is a letter I hope you will print. If you wish to contact me, you can =
call my office (713.621.6550) or page me (888.906.9761). Thank you for you=
r consideration.

Steven J. Kean
Executive Vice President and Chief of Staff
Enron Corp.


It's hard to tell what motivates Paul Krugman's frequent attacks on Enron (=
"Enron Goes Overboard" August 17). His latest attack is no more than a str=
ing of misstatements and non-sequitors reminiscent of a schoolyard taunt. =
He reveals, in depth, his ignorance of Enron, the people who work here, and=
the tragically botched California regulatory regime. Perhaps he seeks mer=
ely to entertain.

=09The broader goal of his personal attack appears to be to discredit the f=
ree market system - a system that entrusts people to make choices and enjoy=
the fruits of their labor, skill, intellect, and heart. He would apparentl=
y rely on a system of government controlled or sponsored monopolies to make=
choices for people. We disagree, finding ourselves less trusting of the i=
ntegrity and good faith of such institutions and their leaders. Ironically=
, the example Krugman cites of "financialization" run amok (the electricity=
market in California) is the product of exactly his kind of system, with a=
ctive government intervention at every step. Indeed, the only winners in t=
he entire California fiasco were the government owned utilities of Los Ange=
les, the Pacific Northwest, and British Columbia. The disaster that squand=
ered the wealth of California was born of regulation by the few, not by mar=
kets of the many. So long as Krugman's elitist reasoning prevails, we are =
doomed to repeat such mistakes.

Steven J. Kean
Executive Vice President and Chief of Staff
Enron Corp.

<< File: replytokrugman.doc <<=20