Enron Mail

From:christi.nicolay@enron.com
To:patrick.hanse@enron.com
Subject:Re: TVA transmission requests
Cc:kevin.presto@enron.com, bill.rust@enron.com, rogers.herndon@enron.com,james.fallon@enron.com, joe.hartsoe@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, steven.kean@enron.com, elizabeth.sager@enron.com, tom.dutta@enron.com
Bcc:kevin.presto@enron.com, bill.rust@enron.com, rogers.herndon@enron.com,james.fallon@enron.com, joe.hartsoe@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, steven.kean@enron.com, elizabeth.sager@enron.com, tom.dutta@enron.com
Date:Tue, 21 Dec 1999 07:48:00 -0800 (PST)

After talking with Kevin P., he said to change the sinks on the firm you want
to TVA. Joe and I will prepare to address the tariff issue at FERC (pro
forma requires ultimate source and sink) to hopefully get the pro forma
tariff changed. Several other providers have raised this issue and backed
off from the requirement.




Patrick Hanse
12/20/99 05:14 PM
To: Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Bill Rust/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, James B
Fallon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Dutta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: TVA transmission requests

Per out requests on Ameren from CE to TVA, we are confirmed on 50 mw's /
month June-Sept. (With TVA our SINK). We also have another 150 mw's /month
July-Aug. w/ CE source, TVA sink, that are in "STUDY" mode.



Enron North America Corp.

From: Kevin M Presto 12/20/99 05:02 PM


To: Bill Rust/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, James B Fallon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrick
Hanse/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Dutta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: TVA transmission requests

Thanks for the update Bill.

I take issue with TVA's statement regarding denial of firm transmission to
our CA's (Enron CA is the sink). TVA is correct with their statement
regarding netting of firm transmission (ie, very few transmission providers
net firm transmission). However, TVA, in the implementation of the NERC
Policy letter, stated that they will make firm transmission available to and
from each control area equal to the capacity capability of the generation and
non-firm transmission availability from our control areas equal to TVA's own
ATC to and from each interconnected control area.

TVA's denial of firm transmission sinking to our control area for the reason
stated in Bill's e-mail is wrong. Although the majority of our firm
transmission requests utilize the 3 control areas as sources (with POD's of
SOCO, EES, and AMRN), we should not tolerate denials of firm transmission
into our control areas because that is completely inconsistent with the NERC
Policy ruling.

By the way, what is the status of the transmission Terry requested from
Com-Ed to TVA (through Ameren)? This would be a situation where our control
area would be a sink. If TVA is, in fact, denying those firm transmission
requests where we are the sink, we need to print out a hard copy of the OASIS
denial and send a letter to NERC and FERC. After further researching the
facts, Christi could you please work with Bill to draft a letter, if
necessary, to send to NERC.