Enron Mail

From:jeff.dasovich@enron.com
To:rick.johnson@enron.com, david.parquet@enron.com, samuel.wehn@enron.com,skean@enron.com, richard.shapiro@enron.com, susan.mara@enron.com, mona.petrochko@enron.com, sandra.mccubbin@enron.com, james.steffes@enron.com, paul.kaufman@enron.com
Subject:Re: Enron and Labor Relationships
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Fri, 8 Sep 2000 04:46:00 -0700 (PDT)

Rick: Thanks very much.




Rick Johnson@ENRON
09/08/2000 11:35 AM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Enron and Labor Relationships

Jeff, per your recent voice mail, below you will find the labor relationship
summary that I prepared for Sandy.
Hope it is helpful, please call if I can be of any assistance. Rj.

---------------------- Forwarded by Rick Johnson/HR/Corp/Enron on 09/08/2000
11:29 AM ---------------------------


Rick Johnson
08/29/2000 07:16 PM
To: Sandy McCubbin
cc:
Subject: Enron and Labor Relationships

Sandy, I was again disapointed to hear that Union leaders are accusing Enron
as being unfriendly to Labor. In the last 20 months we have pursued
construction on over 3000 MW of new generation capacity.
Enron Development Activity subject to Building & Construction Trade Labor
Agreements
California
500 mw - PDEF - FeB. 99
750 mw - PEF - Feb. 2000
Indiana
550 mw- Westfork Development - Oct. 99
Illinois
680 mw - Lincoln Energy Facility - Nov 99
Tennessee
540 mw - Gleason Power I - Oct 99
Oregon
240 mw - Coyote II (planned January 2001)
Ethynol Plant - Columbia County - Baugh Const. June 2000

Hopefully this will prove to be valuable information: In addition to the
direct agreements, Enron is pursuing third party projects in Chicago and New
York City that will be subject to labor agreements.

If the parties are interested, feel free to have them contact me directly
503-464-7548
Regards, Rick Johnson