|
|
Enron Mail |
I based the code of conduct on what Sam Behrends had drafted for
the NETCO MBR application; as you suggest, it may be preferable to use the code that EPMI or PGE uses. One other thing that we still need to focus on is the undertaking in footnote 17 of the February 1 draft concerning standards of conduct for the pipelines, or at least Transwestern.. -----Original Message----- From: James.D.Steffes@enron.com [mailto:James.D.Steffes@enron.com] Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 4:26 PM To: Fels, Nicholas Cc: Louise.Kitchen@enron.com; Haedicke@enron.com; louis.eber@ubsw.com Subject: RE: UBS Notes at FERC Mtg Looks good. I need to find a different version of Code of Conduct that more closely mimics EPMI and PGE version. The agreement in Appendix B right now may be too restrictive for our current dealings. Agree that we need to finish up details of (a) data transfer and (b) transistional services agreement. In my discussions on Friday, the transitional services will be "agent" type activities. Enron needs help in making sure that it can service its contracts. No UBS Warburg Energy employee will make commercial decisions for Enron - simply perform directed activities. The question of data transferred is still outstanding, but I will hopefully know more on Monday am. I am checking on exactly how much Counterparty info will be held by UBS Warburg Energy. I plan on being in your office first thing Tues am. Thanks, Jim -----Original Message----- From: "Fels, Nicholas" <nfels@cov.com<@ENRON [mailto:"Fels, Nicholas" <nfels@cov.com<@ENRON] Sent: Sat 2/2/2002 5:27 PM To: Steffes, James D. Cc: Subject: RE: UBS Notes at FERC Mtg Here is what I had come up with. My thought is that the bold Roman numeral headings would make up an agenda, which we should send to Cindy Marlette on Monday, along with a list of those who will attend for UBS. The subheadings, which would not appear on the what we send to FERC, would be the main items for discussion. I don't think your approach and mine are very far apart. I might be somewhat less affirmative about raising the Section 203 issue. It will surely come up as we describe what will or will not be transferred. I also think it would be very helpful to clear up the points about the approach to existing Enron customers, and the transitional arrangements before the meeting I would like, in any event, to put something into the MBR application on transition arrangements that is more definitive--in the right way--than footnote 12 of the draft I sent out yesterday. -----Original Message----- From: Steffes, James D. [mailto:James.D.Steffes@ENRON.com <mailto:James.D.Steffes@ENRON.com<] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 7:27 PM To: Fels, Nicholas Subject: UBS Notes at FERC Mtg Nick -- Here is a draft of some talking points on the FERC meeting. May need to shorten. I am very concerned about the data UBS will acquire and the access to contracts, and implications for 203. Jim <<UBS Pre-Filing Outline.doc<< ****************************************************************** **** This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you. ****************************************************************** **** - AGENDA FOR UBS AG MEETING WITH FERC STAFF2-2.doc << AGENDA FOR UBS AG MEETING WITH FERC STAFF2-2.doc <<
|