Enron Mail

From:tim.belden@enron.com
To:eddy.daniels@enron.com, louise.kitchen@enron.com
Subject:RE: More Portland Issues
Cc:david.steiner@enron.com, f..calger@enron.com
Bcc:david.steiner@enron.com, f..calger@enron.com
Date:Wed, 6 Feb 2002 08:58:41 -0800 (PST)

Here is a trade for you. According to the Master Agreement, all technology=
equipment on Schedule 27 was being conveyed to UBS. All FF&E on Schedule =
18 was not. It turns out that the Estate in Portland needs some of the tec=
hnology equipment on Schedule 27. This includes servers, computers, printe=
rs, etc. We need some of the stuff on Schedule 18 such as the desks and ch=
airs. We are guaranteed use of this stuff so long as we stay in this build=
ing. Therefore, we could use it forever for free if we chose to stay here.=
It seems that we have a fair trade here. If you don't convey this equipm=
ent to us the only effect is that you will likely prevent us from moving as=
it will be too expensive!!! An option to buy the equipment from the estat=
e is essentially a worthless option. The furiture will have little value t=
o the estate and may be a liability as demand for that stuff in Portland is=
low and the cost to move is high (e.g., in Mexico shutting down the office=
cost $40k plus storage fees to move furniture into storage). Furthermore,=
I have no reason to believe that an accounting firm working for the estate=
will give us a "fair" value on the furniture. We don't want any furniture=
from the 4th floor that the estate will need. Bottom line, we can give th=
e estate computers and servers and they can keep the fourth floor furniture=
and everything will work well for them. We give up some computers and ser=
vers to the estate but keep the furniture on the 3rd floor. Everyone is ha=
ppy and it makes economic sense.

Let's just do this trade that makes sense for everybody.



-----Original Message-----
From: Daniels, Eddy=20
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 8:45 AM
To: Belden, Tim; Kitchen, Louise
Subject: RE: More Portland Issues


I have asked Jeff Golden and Don Miller. Don is leaning towards giving UBS=
a purchase option at fair market value. Though I haven't heard from Jeff,=
he could decide to "give" UBS the FF&E now, but he'd probably need to trad=
e it for something else he wants.

-----Original Message-----
From: Belden, Tim=20
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 6:22 PM
To: Daniels, Eddy; Kitchen, Louise
Subject: More Portland Issues


It was just brought to my attention by Dave Steiner that the Estate will co=
ntinue to own the F(urniture), F(ixtures), and E(quipment) and that UBS wil=
l be able to use it for free so long as we are in this building.

As you both know, it is possible that we will move from this floor and woul=
d like to take a good portion of the FFE with us. My understanding is that=
Enron is leasing the furniture in Houston and owns the furniture in Portla=
nd. Therefore, it makes sense for the Houston office to continue to use th=
e furniture but not move it. It doesn't make as much sense here as it will=
be expensive for the Estate to dispose of the furniture here and it will b=
e even more expensive to move it to sell it.

Here's the issue -- the Estate should convey the furniture in Portland to U=
BS. Is this possible? What do we need to do to make this happen?