|
|
Enron Mail |
Yup
-----Original Message----- From: Lavorato, John Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 1:17 PM To: Kitchen, Louise Subject: RE: CPUC - CA is that steffes -----Original Message----- From: Kitchen, Louise Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 11:56 AM To: Lavorato, John Subject: FW: CPUC - CA another one to delainey -----Original Message----- From: Shapiro, Richard Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:47 AM To: Leff, Dan; Steffes, James D.; Blachman, Jeremy; Dietrich, Janet; Dasovich, Jeff; Delainey, David W.; Sharp, Vicki; Smith, Mike D. Cc: Lavorato, John; Kitchen, Louise Subject: RE: CPUC - CA Dan: Relative to support of California issues for "EES/OLDCO", once Jim and his group begin supporting NETCO, there will be staff remaining (clearly, staffing will be tight, and it's still my hope that Jim decides to stay with "OLDCO/NEWCO) in regulatory affairs (5 professionals including myself) to support you and others on California as well as all other issues for "EES/OLDCO as well as NEWCO....Thanks...Rick -----Original Message----- From: Leff, Dan Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:36 AM To: Steffes, James D.; Blachman, Jeremy; Dietrich, Janet; Dasovich, Jeff; Shapiro, Richard; Delainey, David W.; Sharp, Vicki; Smith, Mike D. Subject: CPUC - CA Jim - Following up on our discussion....... Thank you for taking the lead to prep and set up a meeting(s) to get the appropriate team(s) prepared to testify on January 24, 2002. I realize that there will be many different activities underway in the next couple of weeks, and we all include maintaining / maximizing the value of the CA book and the CPUC activities as critically important. Thanks - Dan
|