Enron Mail

From:lorraine.lindberg@enron.com
To:dennis.alters@enron.com, ben.asante@enron.com, larry.campbell@enron.com,earl.chanley@enron.com, kelly.allen@enron.com, teb.lokey@enron.com, ron.matthews@enron.com, stephen.veatch@enron.com
Subject:FW: San Juan Expansion Options - Small Volume
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Tue, 22 Jan 2002 09:05:41 -0800 (PST)

Please plan to attend a meeting to discuss moving forward on the expansion =
of the San Juan Lateral (as stated in Ron's memo below). The meeting will =
be on Thursday, 1/24 from 2:00 - 3:00 pm in EBN 1336. Larry - the phone # =
is 713-345-2846. Thank you.

-----Original Message-----
From: =09Harris, Steven =20
Sent:=09Wednesday, January 16, 2002 3:56 PM
To:=09Matthews, Ron; Watson, Kimberly; Lindberg, Lorraine; Asante, Ben; Alt=
ers, Dennis; Keller, John R.
Cc:=09Eisenstein, Arnold L.; Centilli, James
Subject:=09RE: San Juan Expansion Options - Small Volume

I would like to pursue as quickly as possible the option of adding the cool=
ers to get the incremental 10,000/d. Please proceed with developing a more =
exact cost estimate and determining from a materials standpoint what the t=
iming of the project might be. Thanks.

=09Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: =09Matthews, Ron =20
Sent:=09Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:42 PM
To:=09Harris, Steven; Watson, Kimberly; Lindberg, Lorraine; Asante, Ben; Al=
ters, Dennis; Keller, John R.
Cc:=09Eisenstein, Arnold L.; Centilli, James
Subject:=09San Juan Expansion Options - Small Volume

Marketing requested Planning to review any and all possibilities to achieve=
small volume expansions through the San Juan lateral. Several facility sc=
enarios were investigated by Planning which are in the attached Excel sprea=
dsheet. Most if not all are too costly to justify installing. However, th=
ere is another option that is not listed in the attached that was a late en=
try. Discussions with Engineering have determined that by cooling the inle=
t air to the turbines would increase the available horsepower. That in tur=
n would increase the station's overall throughput. Preliminary studies ind=
icate that approximately 10 MMcf/d of additional throughput could be realiz=
ed if inlet air cooling is installed. The + 30% estimate for two units wou=
ld be $600,000. BIG bargain compared to the options in the attached file. =
The facility installation is not a major job but the FERC approval to util=
ize additional horsepower could take 6 - 9 months. Other considerations to=
review would be the air quality permit for the increase in horsepower, and=
potential environmental clearances to do construction. Let me know what y=
ou think about this suggestion. Please feel free to call.

Ron Matthews


<< File: SJLEXP01.XLS <<