Enron Mail |
Attached below is a copy of the meeting notes from the Field UAF meeting.
-----Original Message----- From: Kneisley, George Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:51 PM To: Jolly, Rich; Bailey, Arnie; Smith, Rick; Roensch, David; Thompson, Charlie; Cessac, Kenneth; Clark, Scott Cc: Tanner, Ben; Williams, Sammy; Kile, Rick; Foutz, Lawrence; Chanley, Earl Subject: update to TW meas. audits Gents: we've audited approx. 33 measurement stations in the past 3 months; the attached spreadsheet contains only the "open" issues, yet to be resolved. We think we identified the "culprit" for TW excess uaf with the leaking valve issue at Bloomfield Hub; keep in mind that was resolved on 7/10/01. July (total system) was a +93,332 mcf gain====0.16% August (total system) was a +67,996 mcf gain = 0.11% We think the TW uaf numbers are holding around zero (+/- 0.1%); for August, the segments look very "tight": West Texas Lateral===TO1===13,380 mcf gain===0.04% Panhandle Lateral====TO2===23,074 mcf gain===0.63% Mainline Lateral======TO3===31,524 mcf gain===0.06% If stations would hold steady flows, maybe we could identify some type of trend; but, they don't==they're up and down, on and off====therefore, each station has bias that can swing the uaf (+ or -) around zero. Our next plan was to audit stations with volumes between 10,000 and 50,000 mcf/day (approx. 25 stations); our question is ==== do we continue with the plan, or let it ride for a couple of months and see what happens?? These audits consume a lot of time for all involved, so we're looking for work direction=== Your suggestions, comments plz
|