RE: SoCal Unbundling

The Draft Proposed Decision for the Comprehensive Settlement doesn't specifically address this 50MM/d. My recollection is that this new capacity was discussed in the SoCal System Adequacy proceeding last summer however the new open access procedures should allow for designating this receipt point capacity from Transwestern. I'll verify this as soon as they issue the final decision which may be this afternoon. gh

-----Original Message-----
From: Harris, Steven
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 12:11 PM
To: Hass, Glen; Porter, J. Gregory; Rapp, Bill; Miller, Mary Kay; Kilmer III, Robert; Lokey, Teb; Donoho, Lindy; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; Lokay, Michelle; McConnell, Mark; Watson, Kimberly; Y'barbo, Paul
Subject: RE: SoCal Unbundling

What about the access to the 50,000/d of new capacity at Needles that was being constructed? Wasn't that part of this proceeding? SoCal had argued that it would go to TW (we needed it for Red Rock).

-----Original Message-----
From: Hass, Glen
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:31 AM
To: Porter, J. Gregory; Rapp, Bill; Miller, Mary Kay; Kilmer III, Robert; Lokey, Teb; Donoho, Lindy; Harris, Steven; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; Lokay, Michelle; McConnell, Mark; Watson, Kimberly; Y'barbo, Paul
Subject: SoCal Unbundling

At yesterdays CPUC meeting the Commission approved on a 3-2 vote the Comprehensive Settlement we supported to unbundle the SoCal system. This includes open access to their backbone system and receipt point procedures we supported. I'll distribute the final order as soon as its available with the effective dates and details. gh