Enron Mail

From:phillip.love@enron.com
To:cathy.sprowls@enron.com
Subject:Re: Latest summary schedules
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Thu, 22 Feb 2001 01:51:00 -0800 (PST)

We can take the 265k if you find that we already took the existing variances.
PL






From: Cathy Sprowls 02/16/2001 10:12 AM


To: Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Latest summary schedules


Phillip,

I can reclass this to synthetic storage. It looks like we may have netted
the pre-existing synthetic storage valance with some other variances and
taken it to the desk in the October,November time frame....

---------------------- Forwarded by Cathy Sprowls/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2001 10:10
AM ---------------------------


Phillip M Love
02/16/2001 09:21 AM
To: Cathy Sprowls/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Latest summary schedules

Also, in 0006 theres is a synthetic deal identified as NN4016 with NNG for
$265K, this deal is in sitara 301891 under CPR Pipeline storage. The terms
match and we should have no variance. Please ask Gas accounting why we do
not have a variance on synthetic line - probably Jim Pond. Thanks.
PL