RE: CA re energy management services

Thanks.? I have changed the party to the parent of the two entities in
question and put the project particulars in the introductory paragraph.?
Otherwise, all of your changes were fine.? You can go ahead and have the
agreement executed and fax or send over.

?

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 1:32 PM
To: Pedigo, Doug
Subject: CA re energy management services

Doug,

Here's the revised CA.? I highlighted the changed terms.? In addition, I
deleted the prior paragraph 11 which said that the agreement supercedes a
prior CA.

I don't know if the InterGen indentity and signatory are the same,? but
obviously I left that for you to determine.? I expect that the Enron entity
which will bid will be EPMI, so I used that entity.

(See attached file: InterGen North America CA may 18.doc)

I beefed up the definition of confidential information due to the
complexity of the issues, and I added 6 months to? the term since things
won't get cranked up for a while.

I look forward to talking to you at your convenience.? Have a good weekend.

Kay

?
- InterGen North America CA may 18.doc