|
|
Enron Mail |
Okay. I will set up a new LLC (Homestead Development Company, LLC, if
available). Would it be preferable for its sole member to be Lauderdale Land Development Company, LLC or ENA? -----Original Message----- From: Mann, Kay Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 12:46 PM To: Carnahan, Kathleen Subject: Re: FW: New lease option I wouldn't use an LLC with an prior history. We might have to get the old stuff approved in order to put the equity into TurboPark. If the LLC paid for an interconnect study, it could be a hard cost and we are dead. I know this seems silly, but hey, it is! ckm From: Kathleen Carnahan/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/23/2001 11:31 AM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: FW: New lease option We have decided to use: Voyager Development Company, L.L.C. for the new Homestead land option. We had initially planned to use it for an option that we let go (Option Agreement never got assigned to Voyager either). According to Greg Krause, the only thing associated with Voyager was an old interconnect study request that was paid for and never used. I feel confident that Voyager is "clean" to use. Kathleen -----Original Message----- From: Ann Elizabeth White Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 12:19 AM To: Kathleen Carnahan Subject: New lease option I talked to Kay about the new land option Greg will be negotiating this weekend in Homestead. She said to put the options in the terminal company, not Lauderdale Land, LLC as you had suggested. Pick one of the other LLCs for me and let me know the name. Thanks.
|