Enron Mail

From:david.fairley@enron.com
To:kay.mann@enron.com, reagan.rorschach@enron.com, heather.kroll@enron.com,tom.may@enron.com, kayne.coulter@enron.com
Subject:RE: ILA/ESMA conflicts
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Tue, 29 May 2001 02:18:00 -0700 (PDT)

Kay -- We should check each on a case by case basis. We probably would be
better off using any definition from the ILA since it was already found to be
acceptable by MDEA unless there is simply a better definition in the ESMA or
some inherent conflict or gap relative to the scope of the overall
agreement. For any that are not obvious to you, please do not hesitate to
continue shooting questions at us for clarification. Should we look at
Ancillary Services? Thanks -- David

-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 8:25 AM
To: Rorschach, Reagan; Fairley, David; Kroll, Heather; May, Tom; Coulter,
Kayne
Subject: ILA/ESMA conflicts

What is your preference when there is a conflict between the interim
agreement and the last draft (v23) of the ESMA. (For instance, the
definition of ancillary services.) Shall I just ignore the ILA, or does it
represent the customers' expectations?

Kay