|
|
Enron Mail |
Please fill in the blank:
=01&First Contingency Transmission Outage=018 means [Rorschach, Reagan] an= Entergy=20 transmission constraint that from time to time results in a transmission cu= t=20 and mandates Clarksdale dispatching their generation assets to serve=20 Clarksdale Native Load. Our obligation during such an event: During first contingency must run=20 conditions, EPMI will document the production costs, megawatts generated,= =20 duration of the event, and lost opportunity costs. =20 From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/31/2001 10:37 AM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: =20 Subject: RE: MDEA Agreement Scheduling I'm still waiting on David Hunt to send me some stuff, which would really= =20 help move the document along. I'll ask again if i can get it from him. The= re=20 are still internal questions in it, which I have annotated. I'm happy for y= ou=20 to look at it fairly shortly, especially if you can give definitive=20 commercial direction. Do you feel that the commercial team is finished with the exhibits? I=20 haven't worked on them, but I suspect the exhibits need work. I know the= =20 bogey calc doc is a bit rough. [Rorschach, Reagan] Exhibits are rough. I= =20 need to make a list of Exhibits called out in the current doc version, pull= =20 them all together, and clean them up.=20 Do you still owe me the emergency transmission cut stuff? [Rorschach, Reaga= n]=20 Yes. I am not exactly sure of the context....but try this on for size: = =20 Clarksdale is subject to an Entergy transmission constraint that from time = to=20 time results in a transmission cut and mandates Clarksdale dispatching thei= r=20 generation assets to serve Clarksdale Native Load. Dispatching Clarksdale= =20 assets under these circumstances is known as the first contingency must run= =20 condition. During first contingency must run conditions, EPMI will documen= t=20 the production costs, megawatts generated, duration of the event, and lost= =20 opportunity cost of buying from the market. Clarksdale is due reimbursemen= t=20 from Entergy for extra costs incurred during such events.=20 Early next week is better than later, and Thursday and Friday are huge=20 problem days for me. When are you thinking of meeting with Beck? Anyway t= o=20 combine the two at once, given the short timeframe? [Rorschach, Reagan] I= =20 think we could get everyone together at the same time as soon as Monday. I= =20 want them to have the time to study the document so we can get it all done = at=20 once. =20 Has Dave signed the extension, by the way? [Rorschach, Reagan] done,=20 fedex'ing to MDEA. Will have faxed copy today. Kay From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/31/2001 09:59 AM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: =20 Subject: MDEA Agreement Scheduling Kay, We are starting to run into some scheduling constraints for next week, at= =20 least with Bob Priest. I'd like to get together with Bob and Marvin early= =20 next week to discuss the agreement--moving toward finalizing before June 12= . =20 Bob is only available Monday. Bob and Marvin think it is a good ideal to= =20 then meet with RW Beck. I'd like to email Marvin and Bob the next version sometime today? Reagan C. Rorschach Enron North America 1400 Smith Street Houston, Texas 77002 713.345.3363
|