Enron Mail

From:reagan.rorschach@enron.com
To:kay.mann@enron.com
Subject:RE: Open items for MDEA
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Fri, 25 May 2001 02:50:00 -0700 (PDT)

If you prorate the min. monthly fee for a partial month, and you prorate the
termination for the balance of that partial month, you--in aggregate--get the
beginning balance shown on the schedule.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 9:40 AM
To: Rorschach, Reagan
Subject: RE: Open items for MDEA

I don't understand the last sentence.




From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/25/2001 09:31 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: Open items for MDEA

The value in the table is the beginning balance for each month. So if they
cancel in the middle of the month, they should pay the balance at the
beginning of that month and no prorated minimum monthly fee. If you prorate
it on both ends, you end up getting the total balance shown at the beginning
of the month.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 9:08 AM
To: Rorschach, Reagan
Cc: Coulter, Kayne; May, Tom; Miller, Jeffrey; Fairley, David
Subject: RE: Open items for MDEA

Schedule reflects amount due for cancellation on or before the stated dates?


From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/24/2001 01:19 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Kayne Coulter/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom May/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey
Miller/ENRON@enronXgate, David Fairley/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: RE: Open items for MDEA

Kay, see attached. The monthly fee should be $13,003. I took the $300k we
have all been discussing and backed out the $12,500 they paid under the ILA
terms.

<< File: Cancellation Fee Schedule.doc <<

Reagan C. Rorschach
Enron North America
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002
713.345.3363

-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kay
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 11:35 AM
To: Mann, Kay
Cc: Rorschach, Reagan; Kroll, Heather; Fairley, David; May, Tom
Subject: Re: Open items for MDEA

More:

We need internal agreement on the cancellation fee schedule, to be included
as an exhibit.

What is the status of the Yazoo City master gas agreement? Do we still want
a master gas agreement for Clarksdale, also? Do we want it now?

Thanks,

Kay





<< OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) <<
Kay Mann
05/23/2001 05:05 PM
To: Reagan Rorschach/Enron@EnronXGate, Heather Kroll/Enron@EnronXGate, David
Fairley/Enron@EnronXGate, Tom May/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:

Subject: Open items for MDEA

Here are issues which I'm unclear about, all of which impact the drafting of
the agreement:


How are we setting the heat rate? Do we have the GADS (?)? Is it a daily
average, weekly average? Flat rate? Adjusted? If so, how often?

Are we comfortable that there are no permit restrictions?

We have determined that we won't deal with fuel oil, right?

We aren't making money on gas, right?

Do we have a defn of costs that we like yet, and if so, how does it fit in to
the picture?

Is there an up-to-date set of exhibits?

It would help if theh commercial part of the team could send me the
following, in words and/or formulae:

The defn and method of establishing the bogey (target production cost)
formula can be an exhibit, which would be great for the commercial team to
work on. Are we determined how we should deal with imbalances (part of cost
of power)? How are we setting the bogey? Formula? Subject to audit? Two
bogeys or one (gas and oil)?

What is defn of profit? I think I have the general idea, but a sentence or
two would be helpful as a reality check. What costs are included on the buy
and sell side?

Re stack model: a sentence or two describing what it is and how it is used.

Updated exhibit on facilities, contracted resources, operating limits.

What information does MDEA need for us to provide in order to split
costs/profits? Are we clear that Cities buy gas, MDEA buys/sells power?

It would be great if I could get one set of answers to these
questions/issues, which has commercial buy in all around.

Thanks,

Kay