|
|
Enron Mail |
You'll also be even more proud to know the outcome of the following text that
I sent to one of my Mexico clients -- "Matthew, with all due respect, clients will be doing business with Enron as it is indentified in the introductory paragraph and the signature block. Indeed, as a side note, most of the documents that I have drafted or reviewed always use some form of acronym for subsequent references to Enron. I am indifferent, but I know that the reason our accounting brethen made that comment, as well as the other comments they often make that seem counter-intuitive, is that it facilitates their efforts in ensuring that documents reflect off-balance sheet, soft costs related rather than on-balance sheet, hard costs. As such, I would defer to them on this issue" which was in response to "Carlos, with all due respect to our Accounting brethren, from a commercial point of view, potential clients don't want to do business with EDM, they want to do business with Enron. So, please switch the EDM thing back to Enron and everything will be fine." Anyway, I think Herman must have forwarded copy of those emails to Lisa who shared it with Joe Deffner and I happened to run into them outside just now and they were both congratulating me for my "toughness". By separate email, I'll forward you a redlined form of interconnect agreement that we can subsequently discuss. Kay Mann 05/29/2001 11:54 AM To: Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: FW: Midway Project - Generic Interconnect Agreement Could you email me the list of issues you have encountered thus far. Ben really wants me to check with you. (I'm so proud!!) Kay ---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/29/2001 11:53 AM --------------------------- From: Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/29/2001 10:42 AM To: Fred Mitro/ENRON@enronXgate, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: FW: Midway Project - Generic Interconnect Agreement Fred / Kay: I spoke to Duran this morning, and he and I would like to meet together with us to discuss the Midway project and whether or not we will be able to utilize TurboPark Phase 2. I previously told him that because of timing considerations and because there may be certain agreements that will be difficult to make TurboPark compliant (such as the attached interconnect agreement from FPL), that Phase 2 may not be practical for purposes of this project. I think this would be a good discussion to have on Friday, because we should have more information on the GE7FAs and should have already spoken with TECO on their proposed MOU (and maybe even the tolling agreement). What are your schedules on Friday? I also would like to schedule a call for tomorrow with TECO to go over the MOU. Fred - Please coordinate with Kay and schedule something with Becky Alex. I would prefer the afternoon if that's OK with you guys, and would like 45 min. before the call for us to meet seperately. Also Fred, please advise on the status of the tolling agreement. Kay - attached is FPL's standard form interconnect agreement. I was thinking that Carlos would be a good choice to review it as he is currently working with accounting / finance on an Ameren interconnect, so he will already be familiar with the likely issues. Please let me know what you think. It will be important to give Duran a summary of likely accounting / finance issues related to this agreement on Friday. Hope you both had good weekends. Regards, Ben -----Original Message----- From: Greg Krause Sent: Mon 5/21/2001 9:00 PM To: Christi L Nicolay Cc: Ben Jacoby Subject: Midway Project - Generic Interconnect Agreement Please see attached for your review and comments. <<FPL Construction & Connection Agreement Generic.doc<<
|