Enron Mail

From:mike.mcconnell@enron.com
To:john.sherriff@enron.com
Subject:Re: J-Block
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Wed, 7 Jun 2000 01:57:00 -0700 (PDT)

John,

Hello from South America. I just got your email and I certainly concur with
Jeff making the call. He has maintained a good relationship with Mulva. This
was a risk that we had but we did have assurances from Phillips regarding
performance. I don't know how much it will help however. Richard Harper and
Mary Nell Browning may have some ideas here but I am sure you've already gone
through it with them. I am amazed how the details get fuzzy on an old
project. When you discussed it, i was trying to think back to our remedies
and discussions but the 3 years have made it difficult.

I don't know if there is anything I can do but I'm always willing to help.

Good luck,
Mike




John Sherriff
06/06/2000 12:09 PM
To: Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Lewis/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter
Crilly/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: J-Block


I mentioned on our conference call on Monday that J-Block has had problems
meeting our nominations from the Judy/Joanne/Janice reservoirs.

Up until recent CATS maintenance shutdown on 15 May, they were making up for
reduced production volumes by nominating to supply gas at the NBP which they
are entitled but not obliged to do. Since return from outage at the end of
May they have declined to nominate at the NBP.

From 1 January to 15 May, the Sellers use of the NBP delivery option kept
underdeliveries to 350 mmcf (ie one day's maximum quantity) in total. Since
returning from the maintenance shutdown, underdeliveries have totalled 850
mmcf ( averaging 77mcf/d ).

We believe that following the sharp rise in market prices during the
maintenance period, they have decided to default on the contract rather than
make up deliveries from other sources. They have an effective cap on the
penalties of about 5 pence per therm (after taking into account the value of
the liquids) and therefore they are not making up the volumes when the daily
price is substantially higher than about 16 pence per therm.

Prior to the CATS shutdown, we had made them a proposal to enable them to
deliver additional volumes at another alternative to avoid default but they
have not responded yet.

You mentioned that in your negotiations with Phillips they had committed to
getting us all the gas regardless of the cap on the penalties. This has cost
us about $1.5 million to date and they seem to be institutionalising their
non performance. Perhaps a phone call by you might help.

By the way I will be in Houston on Thursday and Friday to meet with the
delegation from Croatia and I will probably be tied up the entire time but if
you need me
for a phone call I can break away.

John