|
|
Enron Mail |
Jay,
Howdy from Houston. I bet it is cooler in NY. I don't really have any other ideas as you addressed below except I changed the word "his" to "the" investment group. As far as other clarification of duties, I don't have any issue with it, but every CEO will call me and ask if this is a change in how they deal with Alan or investments. What is the status with Steve and how the group is organized? Did you talk with him and let him know that he is a stand alone dealmaker with an area of concentration? Is that your official assigned work number? If not, we need to get one assigned before the email goes out. Also, I am assuming that this is in the MG office not the small Enron office, is that accurate? Greg and I both think that the MG office is the best location and will help them assimilate with Enron. Thanks, Mike PS, good luck in the move Jay Fitzgerald@ENRON 07/17/2000 02:40 PM To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Reorg announcemnt 1) I'm not sure it is appropriate to get into organizational details of how diiferent units will work together in an organizational memo. We are working well communicating with and sharing deals between and amongst the various groups/business units on an informal basis. Formalization of this process here adds litlle, and may detract. 2) How else do I refer to it other than Steve and his group in the context in which this is written. Suggestions appreciated! Jay P.S. I know I owe you an accomplishments list, but as of now, I don't really know of too many for 1H2000. I do not like to be too creative with these types of lists, and am not typically at a loss, but right now, I am a bit light. We should discuss this in person, and sooner rather than later. Tomorrow is my last day in Houston. Give me a ring at your convenience. Enron North America Corp. From: Mike McConnell @ ECT 07/17/2000 07:55 AM To: Jay Fitzgerald/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Re: Reorg announcemnt Jay, I like it. Two questions. 1. You didn't address how our investment group will work with other groups, specifically, EEL, ENA will (may) be different than how it works (and approves) investments with the investments from the other business groups. 2. You still called it Steve's group. Do you want to address the issue more directly or leave it more ambiguous? What are your thoughts? mike Jay Fitzgerald@ENRON 07/13/2000 05:29 PM To: mike.mcconnell@enron.com cc: Subject: Reorg announcemnt What do you think about this one?
|