Enron Mail

From:mike.mcconnell@enron.com
To:virginia@clarkfineart.com
Subject:Re: No subject was specified.
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Sat, 20 Jan 2001 00:39:00 -0800 (PST)

Virginia,

Hello. I was originally inquiring about purchasing a Cross or Signac
impressionist lithograph. I found them and purchased both from a gallery in
London, William Weston. They should be delivered this week. They are
beautiful and will add a lot to our collection. By the way the Lichtenstein
is up and hanging in our formal living room and it is magnificent. I have
also purchased an Appel in the last month.

I am interested in several artists. Actually, a lot. I will be looking for
one or more of the following. My concept is that overtime I would like to
own one of all the following artists and they are all depending when I find
something that we really like. I listed all of our (sometimes mine vs. my
wife's favorites and priorities). They are kind of in rank order but as I
stated if I find the piece that I like we will purchase it. I want signed
and numbered. I realize that some were not signed by the artist but it is an
important fact in my buying decision. I also realize that some may not have
done any works on paper or they are outrageously expensive. For example, I
would like to know if Rothko or Kline did any work on paper.

At least that is what I am thinking now.

Bonnard (colorful only)
Lautrec
Suerat (any works on paper? - I don't know that he did any)
Other impressionist or post impressionist lithos
Braque
Moore
Arp
Rouault
Modrian
Rothko
Kline
Motherwell

By the way, I am interested in re-looking at a Picasso (although we have 2)
that your gallery had a couple of years ago. It was a cubist piece from the
1920s and I believe you called the technique a "push wa" (pronunciation Vs an
attempt at the proper spelling). It was for sale in a couple of galleries in
SF and was about $20,000. Is there 1 available? Also I am still thinking
about the Matisse we discussed before but as you can see, I have a lot of
other artists I am interested in and it may remain on the back burner because
we already have one.

Thanks,
mike