![]() |
Enron Mail |
Rika,
Just to let you know a couple of things: 1. The NRC (Chairman Meserve's executive assistant) called us specifically = today to let us know the daily plant status was back. However, they said t= hey are still in a test mode and the data may not all be there and what's t= here may not all be accurate. They are still working toward having everyth= ing up and rolling perfect by the end of the month (although it seems they = will improve on that target). 2. The Indian Point 2 meeting was about what we expected. The NRC has a li= ttle more confidence in the way Entergy is proceeding than it had in Con Ed= ison. However, IP2 remains the only plant in the country with multiple deg= raded cornerstones in the NRC's reactor oversight process, and is still wea= k in several of those areas including: Design Configuration Control, Human = Performance, Equipment Reliability, Emergency Preparedness, and Corrective = Actions. One of the major disadvantages that Entergy has with IP2 is its l= ocation in the Northeast (Anti-nuke country). There were more than 120 peo= ple at the meeting, of which about half were general public. The public wa= s not friendly and voiced complaints and protests against the quality of op= eration. While this of itself will not hurt Entergy's operation efforts, i= t does bear heavily on the NRC's attitude toward the plant. The NRC does n= ot want to be embarrassed as it has in the past (most notably with Millston= e). If Entergy loses ground in their recovery efforts especially in the ar= ea of security, the NRC will step in to take more drastic action. Dan
|