Enron Mail

From:thane.twiggs@enron.com
To:jeffery.ader@enron.com, mark.bernstein@enron.com, scott.healy@enron.com,janelle.scheuer@enron.com, tom.dutta@enron.com, dana.davis@enron.com, paul.broderick@enron.com, chris.dorland@enron.com, gautam.gupta@enron.com, michael.brown@enron.com, john.ll
Subject:PJM RTO Filing/ PJM Answer to Motion for Defer the FERC ruling on
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:07:00 -0800 (PST)

Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Thane Twiggs
X-To: Jeffery Ader, Mark Bernstein, Scott Healy, Janelle Scheuer, Tom Dutta, Dana Davis, Paul J Broderick, Chris Dorland, Gautam Gupta, Michael Brown, John Llodra, George Wood, Joe Gordon, Stephen Plauche, Jennifer N Stewart, David Guillaume, Tom May, Robert Stalford, Jeffrey Miller, Narsimha Misra, Joe Quenet, Paul D Thomas, Ricardo Perez, Kevin M Presto, Sarah Novosel, Christi L Nicolay
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \Joseph_Quenet_Dec2000\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Quenet-J
X-FileName: jquenet.nsf

Answer of PJM Interconnection, LLC., to Motion of New England Public Power
Systems for Deferral of decision until January 15, 2001. At issue is whether
a ruling by the FERC on the merits of PJM as an RTO may set an unfair
precident that may affect other regional RTO filings. In their answer PJM
asks that the FERC not delay action as requested by NEPPS and argues that the
fact that a decision may be precedential clearly is not a basis for
withholding a decision. PJM adds that Commission guidance as a precedent
would in fact, be beneficial to RTO development. PJM is also concerned that
a delay would affect the creation of PJM West with Allegheny Power since a
deferal until January 15, 2001 may affect the negotiations and implementation.