![]() |
Enron Mail |
suggested draft order:
scenario 5 franchise teams and 7 non-franchise franchise teams ranked 1 - 5 based on total points of franchise player from previous year First the supplemental draft Round one # 5 franchise team, # 7 supplemental , # 4 franchise , # 6 supplemental and so forth and so on with a non snake system going from there ok everyone chew on that and spit back Dutch -----Original Message----- From: "Smith, Jeff" <Jeff_Smith@AFCC.com<@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Smith+2C+20Jeff+22+20+3CJeff+5FSmith+40AFCC+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 10:44 AM To: 'Kiske, Chris'; 'Kevin'; Ty Servello; Mike Deluke; Michael Currie; Jody Spottswood; Jeff Ullrich; Grant Johnson; Quigley, Dutch; Dan Wienserski; Chris Kiske (Home); BJ Naman; Andy Reynolds Subject: RE: Franchise Players and the Draft The snake thing is good and bad. But I think the first round should be randomly selected for ALL teams because the current way gives those not keeping a franchise player a double benefit by picking in the supplemental and then also at the top of the first round. Theoretically the non keeper teams are getting the 8-14 best players who are arguably also franchise players. In effect by not keeping a player you are randomly selecting a lower level franchise player. So they shouldn't get the an automatic shot at 15-22 or whatever it might be as well. So snake or no snake all of round one should be random order. < -----Original Message----- < From: Kiske, Chris [SMTP:Chris.Kiske@arbitron.com] < Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 9:59 PM < To: 'Kevin'; Ty Servello; Mike Deluke; Michael Currie; Jody Spottswood; < Jeff Ullrich; Smith, Jeff; Grant Johnson; Dutch Quigley; Dan Wienserski; < Chris Kiske (Home); BJ Naman; Andy Reynolds; Kiske, Chris < Subject: RE: Franchise Players and the Draft < < As the creator of the algebraic mean sequenced draft order that was built < to eliminate the inherent advantage that the #1 & #14 teams had by getting < back to back picks every other round, I think the time for mathematical < preciseness has passed. I'm all for going to a simplified traditional < snake system. Frankly, at this point I think there are as many < disadvantages to being 1 or 14 (or 2 - 13) as advantages that it all works < itself out. Hell, if it makes preparing for the draft any easier (or < administering the league), I'm for it! < < PS - I'm for keeping TE's too! < < (Somewhere, Rick is rolling over in his grave) < < < -----Original Message----- < From: Kevin [mailto:klyn@pdq.net] < Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 5:53 PM < To: Ty Servello; Mike Deluke; Michael Currie; Jody Spottswood; Jeff < Ullrich; Jeff Smith (E-mail); Grant Johnson; Dutch Quigley; Dan < Wienserski; Chris Kiske (Home); BJ Naman; Andy Reynolds; Chris Kiske < (Work) < Subject: Franchise Players and the Draft < < < The following is the list of franchise players that have been kept: < < Grant Johnson - Eddie George < Jeff Smith - Peyton Manning < Michael Deluke - Marshall Faulk < Michael Currie - Edgerrian James < Jeff Ullrich - Kurt Warner < < I know this was brought up last year and we kind of decided much of < nothing...but does anyone object to going to a snake system for the draft. < 1-14, 14-1 for the whole draft? We will still have a supplemental round < for those that do not keep franchise players. Then the non-franchise < teams will pick in opposite order of the supplemental round for round < one...thus if you pick first in the supplemental round, you will pick last < (for those that did not keep franchise players) in the first round. Then, < the teams that kept franchise players will be randomly selected to pick at < the end of the first round. After the first round, the draft will snake < back the other way with the last pick in the first round getting the first < pick in the second round and the draft will continue in this snake order < until the end of the draft. Let me know what you think or if you are < confused. < < See everyone at the draft!!! < < Kevin < <
|