Enron Mail

From:bill.rapp@enron.com
To:gregory.porter@enron.com
Subject:RE: Transwestern/USGT - Response to Data Request
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Wed, 12 Dec 2001 07:12:24 -0800 (PST)

Actually, I recommended that we attach the entire bids and not the summaries. I believe it was Mary Kay and Steve Kirk who thought the summaries would be better.

-----Original Message-----
From: Porter, J. Gregory
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 6:37 AM
To: Rapp, Bill
Subject: RE: Transwestern/USGT - Response to Data Request

I am ok with a summary (although I don't think it is as powerful of evidence, assuming the bids show we complied). Out of curiosity, why are summaries better (or should I ask: Whats wrong with the bids). Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: Rapp, Bill
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 11:16 AM
To: Miller, Mary Kay; Kirk, Steve
Cc: Porter, J. Gregory; Pavlou, Maria
Subject: Transwestern/USGT - Response to Data Request

I'm having faxed to each of you a summary that was prepared by Michelle Lokay of the bids that were received by third parties for the USGT capacity. I understand that the preference is to provide FERC with a summary rather than the actual bids.