Enron Mail

From:richard.ring@enron.com
To:bob.hansen@enron.com
Subject:RE: MD Index Product - Scheduling Fee
Cc:michele.raque@enron.com
Bcc:michele.raque@enron.com
Date:Thu, 11 Oct 2001 07:57:09 -0700 (PDT)

Bob,

Michelle and I need to discuss the BGE product with you at your convenience.

Richard

-----Original Message-----
From: Hansen, Bob
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 9:30 AM
To: Ring, Richard
Subject: RE: MD Index Product - Scheduling Fee


Great...Thanks!



From: Richard Ring/ENRON@enronXgate on 10/10/2001 09:20 AM
To: Bob Hansen/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Michele Raque/ENRON@enronXgate, Narsimha Misra/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: RE: MD Index Product - Scheduling Fee

Bob,

I think that for the moment the $0.25/MWh for the scheduling fee component is fine to utilize. Michelle is in the process of reviewing all BGE scheduling requirements and within the next few days should have be able to determine the accuracy of the $0.25/MWh scheduling fee component.

Richard

-----Original Message-----
From: Hansen, Bob
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 9:10 AM
To: Pan, Liqun; Ring, Richard; Raque, Michele
Cc: Johnson, Gillian
Subject: MD Index Product - Scheduling Fee


Good Morning....

As a placeholder, Narsimha previously suggested $0.25/MWH for the scheduling fee component of the fixed "Management Fee". Do you think this is still a reasonable number to use? If so, we would use it in our notional estimates, and Deal Management would use the same value for executable pricing.

Thanks!
Bob