|
|
Enron Mail |
Hello all!
I met with Diann Huddleson today and she clarified some issues for me regar= ding the DASRing of customers in California. Unfortunately it wasn't what = we wanted to hear. On the easy side of things, all residential customers (PGE, SCE, SDG&E) wer= e turned back to the utilities starting May 30th (DASRs were submitted and = they are cycling off now depending upon meter reading cycles, etc.) These = customers received a letter letting them know about it. On the commercial side of things (Diann had no distinctions between small c= ommercial & large commercial & industrial customers), SDG&E customers have = been ours all along and have never been DASRed and reDASRed. In PGE & SCE,= IBM behind PGE was also never put through the DASR process and has continu= ously received our product. All other PGE & SCE customers were originally = submitted for DASRing back to the utilities on - January 31!!!!! That prov= ides enough issues of its own, but I'll get to that. PGE did a virtual swi= tch so as of Jan 31 all these customers became PGE's again, but with SCE, w= hen a customer was switched depending upon meter reading cycles, etc. All = de-DASRed customers were then re-DASRed back to us starting June 21, and Di= ann indicated that not only all of our old customers were re-DASRed, but ne= w contracts were being executed and these new customers were also being DAS= Red to us. No communication about all of this has been sent to the custome= rs, but as we discussed, some personal basis notice may have been given to = our larger customers through the reps. So - I'm not worried about the residential side - we'll have to send them a= n annual historical label next April (with perhaps a letter explaining why = they're still receiving info from us). As far as the commercial/industrial= ....... 1. No notice was provided to probably the majority of the customers. 2. They've been receiving system mix since Feb 1 and we've been proceeding= as if it were actually BIZMIX - i.e. the 2nd quarter labels they just rece= ived indicated BIZMIX, as appropriate to the customer. 3. What are the new customers (those as being DASRed to us the first time = as of June 21) being told they are receiving? Are they being marketed BIZM= IX? 4. As far as dates are concerned for reporting purposes, will we just use = those given as the date of submission (i.e. Jan 31, May 30, June 21) as it = is impossible to pinpoint when each individual customer transferred? Let me know your input. Heather
|