|
|
Enron Mail |
Peggy:
Let me know if you did not receive the copies of the bizmix letters I sent = down to you? Stacey Bolton Environmental Strategies Enron Corp 713-853-9916 direct=20 713-303-2632 cell=20 sbolton@enron.com <mailto:sbolton@enron.com< =20 -----Original Message----- From: =09Mathis, Heather =20 Sent:=09Wednesday, August 29, 2001 7:56 AM To:=09Mahoney, Peggy; Bolton, Stacey Cc:=09Castano, Marianne; Ring, Richard Subject:=09RE: CA BIZMIX Issues/Confidential Peggy/Stacey: What is the status of this letter? Thanks, Heather ---------------------- Forwarded by Heather Mathis/HOU/EES on 08/29/2001 07= :54 AM --------------------------- From:=09Stacey Bolton/ENRON@enronXgate on 08/06/2001 03:00 PM To:=09Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES cc:=09Richard Ring/HOU/EES@EES, Heather Mathis/HOU/EES@EES=20 Subject:=09RE: CA BIZMIX Issues/Confidential I'm sending down a copy of the letters. Stacey Bolton Environmental Strategies Enron Corp 713-853-9916 direct=20 713-303-2632 cell=20 sbolton@enron.com <mailto:sbolton@enron.com< =20 -----Original Message----- From: =09Castano, Marianne =20 Sent:=09Monday, August 06, 2001 2:59 PM To:=09Mahoney, Peggy Cc:=09Ring, Richard; Bolton, Stacey; Mathis, Heather Subject:=09RE: CA BIZMIX Issues/Confidential Thanks, Peggy...MLC << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) <<=20 Peggy Mahoney 08/06/2001 01:16 PM To:=09Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES cc:=09=20 Subject:=09RE: CA BIZMIX Issues/Confidential << OLE Object: StdOleLink <<= =20 I just talked to Stacey and I think we'll send a letter discussing the fact= that the funds have run out, etc. I'll be back to you with a draft. Thanks Peggy =20 << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) <<=20 Marianne Castano 08/02/2001 12:05 PM To:=09Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES cc:=09=20 Subject:=09RE: CA BIZMIX Issues/Confidential << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) << =09 << OLE Object: = Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) << =09 This is in regard to discontinuation of the Biz Mix product -- as you can s= ee from the messages from Stacey below, we have stopped offering the produc= t because the energy credit funds have been depleted. I'm still going to a= sk Richard Ring (He's on vacation) on Monday your question -- ie, is there= any way we can continue with it, notwithstanding. I fear he is going to = say its possible to do so, but at an extreme loss of $$$....MLC ---------------------- Forwarded by Marianne Castano/HOU/EES on 08/02/2001 = 01:01 PM --------------------------- From:=09Stacey Bolton/ENRON@enronXgate on 08/02/2001 12:00 PM To:=09Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES cc:=09=20 Subject:=09RE: CA BIZMIX Issues You're welcome. Hope I see you on Monday. My understanding is that surpri= singly some of the money that we've already submitted has been paid due (de= spite the fund being depleted) to overpayment/accounting issues with other = entities. This also has to do w/ the time lapse between filing for reimbur= sement for 3 months prior (i.e. I don't think Richard anticipated getting p= aid for some of January's purchases because technically the fund ran out in= December). There is definitely not enough money to continue buying going = forward in the C&I fund. It might be replenished next January provided dir= ect access goes through. =20 -----Original Message----- From: =09Castano, Marianne =20 Sent:=09Thursday, August 02, 2001 11:44 AM To:=09Bolton, Stacey Cc:=09Ring, Richard; Mathis, Heather Subject:=09RE: CA BIZMIX Issues Thanks, Stacey. I hope all's well. I'm going to get with him on Monday (I= 'll be in Houston) -- I seem to recall his mentioning that one particular f= und is not 100% depleted, and that technically, we could continue to offer = the product. Do you remember his noting this? MLC From:=09Stacey Bolton/ENRON@enronXgate on 08/02/2001 11:30 AM To:=09Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES cc:=09Richard Ring/HOU/EES@EES, Heather Mathis/HOU/EES@EES=20 Subject:=09RE: CA BIZMIX Issues Richard is on vacation until Monday. To continue the Bizmix product, we wo= uld need the customer credit monies. The customer credit monies for the Bi= zmix were depleted in January. Perhaps Richard can work a deal for tags, b= ut I still think this would be a premium and affect their positions in CA. = I'm sure Richard will give you more detail, but wanted to make sure you we= re aware of the situation w/ the incentive funds. -----Original Message----- From: =09Castano, Marianne =20 Sent:=09Thursday, August 02, 2001 8:52 AM To:=09Bolton, Stacey Cc:=09Ring, Richard; Mathis, Heather Subject:=09RE: CA BIZMIX Issues Peggy informed me on Monday that she did not want to send any notice letter= s to customers advising of the discontinuation of bixmiz, and asked if we c= ould somehow, someway, continue to offer the product going forward. I have= a message into Richard re: Peggy's message to me...MLC ---------------------- Forwarded by Marianne Castano/HOU/EES on 08/02/2001 = 09:47 AM --------------------------- From:=09Stacey Bolton/ENRON@enronXgate on 08/01/2001 05:21 PM To:=09Heather Mathis/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Ring/HOU/EES@EES, Marianne Castan= o/HOU/EES@EES cc:=09Michael Terraso/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON=20 Subject:=09RE: CA BIZMIX Issues My suggestions are below. Thanks Heather for the helpful update. -----Original Message----- From: =09Mathis, Heather =20 Sent:=09Tuesday, July 31, 2001 1:30 PM To:=09Bolton, Stacey; Ring, Richard; Castano, Marianne Subject:=09CA BIZMIX Issues Hello all! I met with Diann Huddleson today and she clarified some issues for me regar= ding the DASRing of customers in California. Unfortunately it wasn't what = we wanted to hear. On the easy side of things, all residential customers (PGE, SCE, SDG&E) wer= e turned back to the utilities starting May 30th (DASRs were submitted and = they are cycling off now depending upon meter reading cycles, etc.) These = customers received a letter letting them know about it. On the commercial side of things (Diann had no distinctions between small c= ommercial & large commercial & industrial customers), SDG&E customers have = been ours all along and have never been DASRed and reDASRed. In PGE & SCE,= IBM behind PGE was also never put through the DASR process and has continu= ously received our product. All other PGE & SCE customers were originally = submitted for DASRing back to the utilities on - January 31!!!!! That prov= ides enough issues of its own, but I'll get to that. PGE did a virtual swi= tch so as of Jan 31 all these customers became PGE's again, but with SCE, w= hen a customer was switched depending upon meter reading cycles, etc. All = de-DASRed customers were then re-DASRed back to us starting June 21, and Di= ann indicated that not only all of our old customers were re-DASRed, but ne= w contracts were being executed and these new customers were also being DAS= Red to us. No communication about all of this has been sent to the custome= rs, but as we discussed, some personal basis notice may have been given to = our larger customers through the reps. So - I'm not worried about the residential side - we'll have to send them a= n annual historical label next April (with perhaps a letter explaining why = they're still receiving info from us). As far as the commercial/industrial= ....... 1. No notice was provided to probably the majority of the customers. [Bolt= on, Stacey] We (or PR) should prepare a customer letter as discussed with = Peggy, notifying them that they are no longer receiving Bizmix ASAP. 2. They've been receiving system mix since Feb 1 and we've been proceeding= as if it were actually BIZMIX - i.e. the 2nd quarter labels they just rece= ived indicated BIZMIX, as appropriate to the customer. [Bolton, Stacey] W= e should look into purchasing green tags to make these customers whole if w= e will be more than 5% off of our projection v. what we actually delivered.= The regs allow for discrepancies between projections and actual, and you = don't have to show an extra column w/ the difference if you are w/in 5% del= ta band between projection and actual.. We can change the projection for t= hird quarter and include this information in the customer letter.=20 3. What are the new customers (those as being DASRed to us the first time = as of June 21) being told they are receiving? Are they being marketed BIZM= IX? [Bolton, Stacey] We should ensure this is not the case with originati= on. Someone in Jeremy B.'s shop will most likely know.=20 4. As far as dates are concerned for reporting purposes, will we just use = those given as the date of submission (i.e. Jan 31, May 30, June 21) as it = is impossible to pinpoint when each individual customer transferred? [Bolto= n, Stacey] We should discuss this a bit. I'm not sure that this will rea= lly matter at the end of the day. The CEC has instructed us all along to s= end labels to the customers, which we have. We'll report the purchases (br= own and green) as normal at the end of the year.=20 Let me know your input. Heather
|