Enron Mail

From:heather.mathis@enron.com
To:patricia.collins@enron.com
Subject:TX Disclosure
Cc:gloria.ogenyi@enron.com, richard.ring@enron.com, heather.mathis@enron.com,marianne.castano@enron.com, stacey.bolton@enron.com
Bcc:gloria.ogenyi@enron.com, richard.ring@enron.com, heather.mathis@enron.com,marianne.castano@enron.com, stacey.bolton@enron.com
Date:Tue, 14 Aug 2001 19:11:00 -0700 (PDT)

Patricia:

My name is Heather Mathis and I work in the Legal Department on Disclosure =
Label issues. Please let me know and I will coordinate preparing your Disc=
losure Label for you when you decide what type of product to sell, per Stac=
ey's e-mail below.

Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Heather Mathis/HOU/EES on 08/14/2001 02=
:09 PM ---------------------------
From:=09Stacey Bolton/ENRON@enronXgate on 08/13/2001 05:41 PM
To:=09Patricia Collins/HOU/EES@EES
cc:=09Gloria Ogenyi/ENRON@enronXgate, Richard Ring/HOU/EES@EES, Heather Mat=
his/HOU/EES@EES, Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES=20
Subject:=09TX Disclosure

Trish:
=20
Yikes....hope you are surviving! You'll need coffee after this product lau=
nch. Here's the lowdown w/ labels in TX. Your 1st label will be a project=
ion or guestimation of what you anticipate delivering to customers. I'd ge=
t w/ Richard Ring on the desk (under Rogers Herndon) to verify that you guy=
s will only be purchasing system mix. You might already have done so. On =
the fuel mix label (do you have a copy?....I'm attaching if you do not), re=
place the heading "Sources of power generation" with "Projected sources of =
power generation". Same w/ emissions....replace "emissions and waste per k=
Wh generated" with "projected emissions and waste per kWh generated". EES =
must then practice "due diligence" in its acquisition of power to ensure yo=
ur projection is as close as possible to your actual. You will change to h=
istorical data on the label after one year (12/31/02). You have some leewa=
y during the pilot as the final label calculation rule has not been adopted=
yet -- though it is unlikely that these requirements will change.
=20
I must get in one other plug. You might seriously want to consider a green=
product option. In Texas, we have a system by which it is more cost-effec=
tive to purchase renewable power. That is how entities such as Green Mount=
ain (label attached below) have been able to launch a 100% wind product. R=
eliant (label attached below) is offering a 100% green product in TXU's ter=
ritory for only 1 cent more per kWH. Reliant's offering is for residential=
only. EPMI and Enron Wind have 135 MW wind facility and you might want to=
price a premium option for the smaller commodity customers from this facil=
ity or from the market in general. I am GLAD to hook you up with the intern=
al folks that can help you w/ purchases for renewable energy. We're having=
a meeting on Thursday from 12-3 to discuss renewable origination and tradi=
ng opportunities in EB 8c1 if you can tear away. Lunch will be served. Le=
t me know.
=20
Regards,
Stacey Bolton
Environmental Strategies
Enron Corp
713-853-9916 direct=20
713-303-2632 cell=20
sbolton@enron.com
https://www.greenmountain.com/gmec/tx/tx_efl.jsp Green Mountain's Electric=
ity Facts Label for TX
https://www.reliant.com/Residential_Secure/1,1667,OUTF-productList,00.html?=
personId=3D&provider=3D44372&submit2=3DContinue&promoCode=3D Reliant's res=
idential label in TXU's territory
http://www.puc.state.tx.us/rules/rulemake/22816/22816arc/110100%20stra.rtf =
Proposed Rule

=20
=20