Re:

---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000
10:28 AM ---------------------------

From: Mitch Robinson @ ENRON 09/25/2000 10:22 AM

To: Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Broussard/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re:

Quick comments. Mike, what are your thoughts on my answer in O5?

I'll provide start numbers for O5 later today.

E2. No; however, CFR60 subpart GG short term limits still apply
(approximately 90 ppm NOx) which are well above the turbine emissions.

T1. "on any asset" should read "of any asset"

O5. Since commercial operations, the Wheatland facility has averaged xx
starts per machine, and the Lincoln facility has averaged yy starts per
machine. The start-up and commissioning process followed a normal startup
progression. The Lincoln facility experienced a generator failure in unit #7
during the first run season. General Electric replaced the generator under
warranty provisions. Sratification of gas flows was observed in the stacks
at the Wheatland facility during CEMS certification. The CEMS certification
was then postponed until Summer '01.

O6. Wasn't it a strip mine? I didn't think it was a coal mine.

Mitch

Benjamin Rogers@ECT
09/25/2000 08:54 AM
To: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:

Mitch:
Here are the questions for Ameren. I wanted to incorporate your comments
before we sent them out today, so if you could comment on some of these
questions that would be very helpful. Thanks
Ben